Epidemiology Research Unit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto

Funder

Organizational Unit

Publications

Eligibility for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis According to Different Guidelines in a Cohort of HIV-Negative Men Who Have Sex with Men in Lisbon, Portugal

Publication . Meireles, Paula; Plankey, Michael; Rocha, Miguel; Rojas, Jesus; Brito, João; Barros, Henrique

Objectives Defining eligibility for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is key to measuring the degree of PrEP implementation. While the clinical exclusion criteria are identical across different guidelines, definitions of substantial HIV risk are not. In this study, we aimed to estimate the proportion of men who have sex with men (MSM) being tested at a community-based voluntary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling and testing center in Lisbon that would be eligible for PrEP according to guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO), the US Public Health Service and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US-CDC), the European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS), and the Portuguese National Health Service (PNHS). Methods We used baseline data from 3392 HIV-negative MSM with valid information on eligibility for PrEP enrolled in the Portuguese Lisbon Cohort of MSM—an observational study designed as an open prospective, noninterval cohort—between March 2014 and March 2018. Results At baseline, the proportion of MSM eligible for PrEP was 67.7% according to the US-CDC, 60.6% according to the PNHS guidelines, 58.9% according to the WHO, and 46.5% according to the EACS guidelines. The most frequently met criteria were those related to condomless anal intercourse. Conclusions In conclusion, in the same population, the proportion of men eligible for PrEP differed by guideline, ranging from 46.5% to 67.7%, though if they all seem to include the same well-known predictors of HIV seroconversion. Policy implications These results show that both the allocation of resources and the approaches to individual risk prediction are highly dependent on the chosen guideline. Moving the focus from assessing risk to assessing whether PrEP is a suitable option for a given individual in a given moment of his life might help to overcome guidelines limitations and create more equitable access.

2020-01-03Journal article

Restricted access

Neuropathic pain after breast cancer treatment and its impact on sleep quality one year after cancer diagnosis

Publication . Fontes, F; Gonçalves, M; Pereira, S; Lunet, N

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding the impact of breast cancer treatment-related neuropathic pain (NP) on sleep quality are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of breast cancer treatment-related NP on patients' sleep quality, during the first year after cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 501 breast cancer patients were followed prospectively. Incident NP was identified through systematic evaluations after treatments and one year after enrolment. NP severity was quantified using the Brief Pain Inventory severity subscale and sleep quality was evaluated through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), at baseline and after one year. Adjusted regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to quantify the relation between NP and the variation in the PSQI z-scores. RESULTS: The occurrence of NP was associated with a deterioration in sleep quality during the first year of follow-up, more pronounced among those with good sleep quality (PSQI≤5) than those with poor sleep quality at baseline (PSQI>5) (β = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.11 to 0.77 versus β = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.08 to 0.59). These differences were accentuated when only the cases of NP with greater severity were considered (β = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.37 to 1.35 versus β = 0.31, 95%CI: -0.08 to 0.64). Within the PSQI components, daytime dysfunction and sleep duration were the most impaired by NP. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of the promotion of sleep hygiene among breast cancer patients diagnosed with NP, especially among those with good sleep quality before treatments.

2017-06Journal article

Open access

Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort

Publication . Viana, Marta; Borges, Andreia; Araújo, Carla; Rocha, Afonso; Ribeiro, Ana; Laszcznska, Olga; Dias, Paula; Maciel, Maria J.; Moreira, Ilidio; Lunet, Nuno; Azevedo, Ana

OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.

2018Journal article

Open access

Prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment in an elder Portuguese population (65–85 years old)

Publication . Pais, Ricardo; Ruano, Luís; Moreira, Carla; Carvalho, Ofélia P.; Barros, Henrique

Background The increase in average life expectancy increases the risk of illness and frailty in the elderly, especially in the cognitive arena. This study has the objective to estimate the prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment, in a representative sample of 65 to 85 years old followed for a mean period of 6-years. Methods Subjects aged 65–85 years (n = 586) were screened at baseline (1999–2004) to estimate the prevalence of cognitive impairment using the Mini-Mental State Examination. A total of 287 individuals with a normal MMSE at baseline were reassessed after 6.2 mean years (± 4.30 years) to evaluate the incidence of cognitive impairment, defined as scoring below the age and education-adjusted MMSE cut-off points adapted for the Portuguese population. We did not exclude Dementia. Results The baseline prevalence of cognitive impairment was 15.5% (95% CI: 12.7–18.7). Higher in women (18.9%; 95% CI: 14.9–23.3), that in men (10.4%; 95% CI: 6.7–15.1). Increased with age and was highest for participants without any schooling. The overall incidence rate was 26.97 per 1000 person-years; higher in women (33.8 per 1000 person-years) than in men (18.0 per 1000 person-years). Higher for the oldest participants and those with no schooling. Taking the standard European population, we estimated a prevalence of 16.5% and an incidence of 34.4 per 1000 person-years. Conclusion The prevalence of cognitive impairment in Portugal is within the estimated interval for the European population, and the incidence is lower than for the majority of the European countries. Women, senior and elders without education have a higher risk of cognitive impairment. In our sample, neither employment nor marital status has a significant effect on cognitive impairment.

2020-11-16Journal article

Open access