Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
135.1 KB | Adobe PDF | |||
138.87 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente artigo propõe-se a revisitar os fundamentos teóricos e conceituais do
constructo poder, entendendo-o como elemento fundamental na Política. Partindo-se de
referencial teórico da filosofia e ciência política, e tendo por base epistemológica o
paradigma da complexidade, apresentou-se uma revisão dos pensamentos de Max Weber,
Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault, analisando-os, num primeiro momento, individualmente,
para, após, identificar as dinâmicas entre si. Para atingir o objetivo proposto, a análise foi
dividida em seis seções: introdução, discussão metodológica à luz das ciências militares,
metodologia, as três perspetivas do poder selecionadas, discussão da teoria e conclusão.
Ao longo da análise, procuraram-se respostas para as seguintes questões: o que é poder?
Quem o detém? Por que meios é exercido? No final, ficou evidenciado o caráter complexo
do objeto de estudo, e as suas matizes voláteis e relacionais que impactam diretamente as
dinâmicas e os fenómenos políticos e militares.
The present article proposes to revisit the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the power construct, assuming it as a fundamental element in the Politics. Initially, it was presented a review of thoughts of Max Weber, Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault. It was held based on the theoretical framework of philosophy and political science, and based on the epistemological basis of the complexity paradigm. First, the three scholars were analyzed separately, after what the dynamics between them where the main object of study. To reach the proposed goal, the analysis was divided into six sections: introduction, methodological discussion in light of the military sciences, methodology, and the three perspectives of the power, analysis and conclusion. Throughout the analysis, we sought the answers to the following questions: What is power? Who holds it? By what means is it exercised? In the end, the complex nature of the object of study, its volatile and relational nuances, which directly affect the dynamics and political and military phenomena, becomes evident
The present article proposes to revisit the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the power construct, assuming it as a fundamental element in the Politics. Initially, it was presented a review of thoughts of Max Weber, Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault. It was held based on the theoretical framework of philosophy and political science, and based on the epistemological basis of the complexity paradigm. First, the three scholars were analyzed separately, after what the dynamics between them where the main object of study. To reach the proposed goal, the analysis was divided into six sections: introduction, methodological discussion in light of the military sciences, methodology, and the three perspectives of the power, analysis and conclusion. Throughout the analysis, we sought the answers to the following questions: What is power? Who holds it? By what means is it exercised? In the end, the complex nature of the object of study, its volatile and relational nuances, which directly affect the dynamics and political and military phenomena, becomes evident
Description
Keywords
Poder Ciências Militares Complexidade Força Consenso Power Military Science Complexity Strengh Consensus