Loading...
Publication
Influência da aptidão física no desempenho ocupacional em polícias do Corpo de Intervenção
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.68 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O objetivo deste estudo foi estudar a influência da aptidão física (ApF) no
desempenho ocupacional em polícias do Corpo de Intervenção.
MÉTODO: Quarenta e dois (42) polícias do Corpo de Intervenção da PSP (34.29 ± 7.60
anos, Altura = 1.77 ± 0.05 m, Peso = 80.97 ± 6.94 kg, IMC = 25.94 ± 1.48 kg/m2
, % MG =
13.00 ± 3.44) realizaram uma bateria de testes físicos com o intuito de avaliar a ApF: teste
T de agilidade, impulsão vertical e horizontal, lançamento da bola medicinal, preensão
manual, abdominais, flexões de braço na trave, sit and reach, supino, agachamento e teste
vaivém. Foi desenvolvido o circuito operacional de ordem pública (COOP) específico para
a SO/CI que envolve várias tarefas: percursos de agilidade, subir e descer escadas, empurrar
e puxar o sled, desferir impactos no plastron com recurso ao bastão de ordem pública,
derrubar o manequim de treino, desferir impactos no pneu com a marreta e arrastar o
manequim. Na realização do COOP controlaram-se as seguintes variáveis: tempo total (s),
tempo por tarefa (s), frequência cardíaca (bpm), lactato (mmol/L), perceção subjetiva do
esforço (PSE). Recorreu-se ao coeficiente de correlação de Pearson para identificar
correlações significativas (p ≤ 0.05) entre as variáveis de ApF e o desempenho no COOP.
A regressão linear múltipla foi utilizada para identificar os preditores de ApF do desempenho
no COOP.
RESULTADOS: Observou-se uma forte correlação negativa entre as variáveis de ApF com
o tempo de realização do COOP: impulsão horizontal (r = -0.611; p < 0.01), força de
preensão manual (r = -0.597; p < 0.01), flexões de braço na trave (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), teste
vaivém associado ao valor do VO2máx (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), lançamento da bola medicinal
(r = -0.512; p < 0.01) e repetição máxima de supino (r = -0.470; p < 0.01). Observou-se uma
forte correlação positiva entre o teste t (r = 0.716; p < 0.01) e o desempenho no COOP. As
variáveis VO2máx, teste de Agilidade, velocidade no exercício de supino com 60 kg e
repetição máxima de supino foram identificados como preditores significativos do
desempenho do circuito através do modelo, Desempenho no COOP= 134.353 – (1.773 *
VO2máx) + (10.426 * Teste T) – (98.393 * Vmed60kg [Supino]) + (0.458 * 1RM [Supino]).
CONCLUSÕES: Concluiu-se que existe uma forte associação entre a ApF e o desempenho
ocupacional (COOP). Complementarmente, foram identificados os preditores de ApF que
explicam uma proporção elevada (78,1 %) da variabilidade do desempenho do COOP.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of physical fitness (PF) on occupational performance in Intervention Corps police officers. METHOD: Forty-two (42) police officers (34.29 ± 7.60 years, Height = 1.77±0.05 m, Weight = 80.97 ± 6.94 kg, BMI = 25.94 ± 1.48 kg/m2, % BF = 13.00 ± 3.44) underwent a battery of physical tests to assess PF: T-test agility, vertical and horizontal jump, medicine ball throw, handgrip strength, abdominal endurance, pull-ups, sit and reach, bench press, squat, and shuttle run. The “Circuito Operacional de Ordem Pública” (COOP) was developed, which involved various tasks: agility courses, stair climbing and descending, pushing and pulling the sled, striking the plastron with a baton, knocking down the training mannequin, striking the tire with a sledgehammer, and dragging the mannequin. During the COOP, the following variables were monitored: total time (s), time per task (s), heart rate (bpm), lactate (mmol/L), subjective perception of effort (SPE). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to identify significant correlations (p ≤ 0.05) between PF variables and COOP performance. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of PF for COOP performance. RESULTS: A strong negative correlation was observed between PF variables and COOP completion time: horizontal jump (r = -0.6 ; p < 0.01), handgrip strength (r = -0.597; p < 0.01), pull-ups (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), shuttle run associated with VO2max value (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), medicine ball throw (r = -0.512; p < 0.01), and bench press maximum repetition (r = -0.470; p < 0.01). A strong positive correlation was observed between the T-test (r = 0.716; p < 0.01) and COOP performance. VO2max, Agility test, speed in the bench press exercise with 60 kg, and bench press maximum repetition were identified as significant predictors of circuit performance through the model COOP Performance = 134.353 – (1.773 * VO2máx) + (10.426 * T-test) – (98.393 * Vmed60kg [Bench Press]) + (0.458 * 1RM [Bench Press]). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there is a strong association between PF and occupational performance (COOP). Additionally, predictors of PF were identified which explain a high proportion (78.1%) of COOP performance variability.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of physical fitness (PF) on occupational performance in Intervention Corps police officers. METHOD: Forty-two (42) police officers (34.29 ± 7.60 years, Height = 1.77±0.05 m, Weight = 80.97 ± 6.94 kg, BMI = 25.94 ± 1.48 kg/m2, % BF = 13.00 ± 3.44) underwent a battery of physical tests to assess PF: T-test agility, vertical and horizontal jump, medicine ball throw, handgrip strength, abdominal endurance, pull-ups, sit and reach, bench press, squat, and shuttle run. The “Circuito Operacional de Ordem Pública” (COOP) was developed, which involved various tasks: agility courses, stair climbing and descending, pushing and pulling the sled, striking the plastron with a baton, knocking down the training mannequin, striking the tire with a sledgehammer, and dragging the mannequin. During the COOP, the following variables were monitored: total time (s), time per task (s), heart rate (bpm), lactate (mmol/L), subjective perception of effort (SPE). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to identify significant correlations (p ≤ 0.05) between PF variables and COOP performance. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of PF for COOP performance. RESULTS: A strong negative correlation was observed between PF variables and COOP completion time: horizontal jump (r = -0.6 ; p < 0.01), handgrip strength (r = -0.597; p < 0.01), pull-ups (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), shuttle run associated with VO2max value (r = -0.676; p < 0.01), medicine ball throw (r = -0.512; p < 0.01), and bench press maximum repetition (r = -0.470; p < 0.01). A strong positive correlation was observed between the T-test (r = 0.716; p < 0.01) and COOP performance. VO2max, Agility test, speed in the bench press exercise with 60 kg, and bench press maximum repetition were identified as significant predictors of circuit performance through the model COOP Performance = 134.353 – (1.773 * VO2máx) + (10.426 * T-test) – (98.393 * Vmed60kg [Bench Press]) + (0.458 * 1RM [Bench Press]). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there is a strong association between PF and occupational performance (COOP). Additionally, predictors of PF were identified which explain a high proportion (78.1%) of COOP performance variability.
Description
Keywords
atleta tático aptidão física circuito ocupacional Polícia tactical athlete physical fitness occupationall circuit Police