Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Comparative assessment of different pre-treatment bonding strategies to improve the adhesion of self-adhesive composites to dentin

datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorInglês, Magali
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Joana Vasconcelos e
dc.contributor.authorAzul, Ana Mano
dc.contributor.authorPolido, Mário
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, António H. S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-06T12:21:25Z
dc.date.available2025-11-06T12:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare the adhesive interface formed in dentin, using self-adhesive composites applied with different bonding strategies, by testing the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and ultramorphology through the use of light microscopy. Permanent, sound human molars were randomly allocated to six experimental groups. The groups included a negative control group, where only etching was performed via EtchOnly; a positive control group where an adhesive was applied, OptiBondFL (OBFL); and an experimental group where a primer was applied using a co-curing strategy together with a composite (Primer_CoCuring). The samples were sectioned into microspecimens for μTBS (n = 8) and into 1-mm thick slabs for light microscopy using Masson’s trichrome staining protocol (n = 3). The statistical analysis included a two-way ANOVA for μTBS data and Tukey’s HSD was used as a post-hoc test (significance level of 5%; SPSS v. 26.0). The results of the μTBS revealed that the self-adhesive composite (F = 6.0, p < 0.018) and the bonding strategy (F = 444.1, p < 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength to dentin. However, their interactions were not significant (F = 1.2, p = 0.29). Etching dentin with no additional treatment revealed the lowest μTBS (VF_EtchOnly = 2.4 ± 0.8 MPa; CC_EtchOnly = 2.0 ± 0.4 MPa), which was significantly different from using a primer (VF_CoCu = 8.8 ± 0.8 MPa; CC_CoCu = 6.3 ± 1.0 MPa) or using the full adhesive (VF_OptiBondFL = 22.4 ± 0.3 MPa; CC_OptibondFL = 21.2 ± 0.4 MPa). Microscopy images revealed that the experimental Primer_CoCuring was the only group with no collagen fibers exposed to the dentin–composite interface. Overall, the use of a primer, within the limitations of this study, increased the bonding of the self-adhesive composite and provided sufficient infiltration of the collagen based on light-microscopic imaging.eng
dc.identifier.citationInglês M, Vasconcelos e Cruz J, Mano Azul A, Polido M, Delgado AHS. Comparative Assessment of Different Pre-Treatment Bonding Strategies to Improve the Adhesion of Self-Adhesive Composites to Dentin. Polymers. 2022; 14(19):3945. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193945
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym14193945
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/59527
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193945
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbiomaterials
dc.subjectdentin bonding
dc.subjectmicrotensile bond strength
dc.subjectpolymerization
dc.subjectself-adhesive composites
dc.subjectlight microscopy
dc.titleComparative assessment of different pre-treatment bonding strategies to improve the adhesion of self-adhesive composites to dentineng
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue19
oaire.citation.startPage3945
oaire.citation.titlePolymers
oaire.citation.volume14
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo_AntonioDelgado_2022_02.pdf
Tamanho:
2.66 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.85 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: