Repository logo
 
Publication

Partial recording protocols performance on the assessment of Periodontitis severity and extent: bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity

2018-11Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, João
dc.contributor.authorMascarenhas, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorCavacas, Maria Alzira
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorMendes, José João
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T10:17:25Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T10:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).pt_PT
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to assess bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity of particular partial-mouth recording protocols (PRPs) to estimate periodontal clinical measurements and periodontal status. Methods: Estimates of mean clinical attachment loss (MCAL) and mean probing depth (MPD) were calculated for 15 different PRPs and were compared to full-mouth recording protocol (FRP) data from 402 Portuguese. Biases, relative biases and intra-class correlations for all PRPs were evaluated. Bland–Altman plots and Receiver Operating Characteristic / Area Under the Curve (ROC/AUC) analysis were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity for each PRP periodontal diagnosis. Results: Regarding MPD, Half RD6 UR/LL and RD6 UL/LR had the lowest bias observed with 0.00 mm (-0.22% and 0.22%, respectively) and all full-mouth PRPs significantly produce an underestimation. Concerning MCAL, the Half MB-B-DL UR/LR had the lowest bias observed with 0.01 mm (0.16%). Excluding CPITN, Full-Mouth PRPs outperforms in average Half Mouth PRPs correlations. The Half RD6 UR/LL had the highest AUC (0.96) with 95.5 and 97.1% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusions: Three half-mouth PRPs (Half MB-B-DL UR/LR, Half RD6 UR/LL and Half RD6 UL/ LR) protocols can be used to estimate periodontal clinical measurements with limited bias, and high sensitivity, specificity, and concordance. All full-mouth PRPs failed to estimate pocket depth means, and for clinical attachment loss, they present less ability then half-mouth partial protocols, despite presenting high sensitivity levels.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMachado V, Botelho J, Mascarenhas P, Cavacas MA, Alves R, Mendes JJ; Partial recording protocols performance on the assessment of Periodontitis severity and extent: bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac . 2018;59(3):145-153pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.24873/j.rpemd.2018.11.239pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1646-2890
dc.identifier.issn1647-6700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/33669
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentáriapt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://doi.org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2018.11.239pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBiaspt_PT
dc.subjectEpidemiologypt_PT
dc.subjectPeriodontal attachment losspt_PT
dc.subjectPeriodontal indexpt_PT
dc.subjectPeriodontal pocketpt_PT
dc.subjectPrevalencept_PT
dc.titlePartial recording protocols performance on the assessment of Periodontitis severity and extent: bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificitypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage153pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage145pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRevista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacialpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume59(3)pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Artigo_RAlves_2018_01.pdf
Size:
517.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

EM - Artigos Científicos