Repository logo
 
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Partial recording protocols performance on the assessment of Periodontitis severity and extent: bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity

Use this identifier to reference this record.
Name:Description:Size:Format: 
Artigo_RAlves_2018_01.pdf517.82 KBAdobe PDF Download

Advisor(s)

Abstract(s)

Objectives: This study aimed to assess bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity of particular partial-mouth recording protocols (PRPs) to estimate periodontal clinical measurements and periodontal status. Methods: Estimates of mean clinical attachment loss (MCAL) and mean probing depth (MPD) were calculated for 15 different PRPs and were compared to full-mouth recording protocol (FRP) data from 402 Portuguese. Biases, relative biases and intra-class correlations for all PRPs were evaluated. Bland–Altman plots and Receiver Operating Characteristic / Area Under the Curve (ROC/AUC) analysis were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity for each PRP periodontal diagnosis. Results: Regarding MPD, Half RD6 UR/LL and RD6 UL/LR had the lowest bias observed with 0.00 mm (-0.22% and 0.22%, respectively) and all full-mouth PRPs significantly produce an underestimation. Concerning MCAL, the Half MB-B-DL UR/LR had the lowest bias observed with 0.01 mm (0.16%). Excluding CPITN, Full-Mouth PRPs outperforms in average Half Mouth PRPs correlations. The Half RD6 UR/LL had the highest AUC (0.96) with 95.5 and 97.1% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusions: Three half-mouth PRPs (Half MB-B-DL UR/LR, Half RD6 UR/LL and Half RD6 UL/ LR) protocols can be used to estimate periodontal clinical measurements with limited bias, and high sensitivity, specificity, and concordance. All full-mouth PRPs failed to estimate pocket depth means, and for clinical attachment loss, they present less ability then half-mouth partial protocols, despite presenting high sensitivity levels.

Description

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Keywords

Bias Epidemiology Periodontal attachment loss Periodontal index Periodontal pocket Prevalence

Pedagogical Context

Citation

Machado V, Botelho J, Mascarenhas P, Cavacas MA, Alves R, Mendes JJ; Partial recording protocols performance on the assessment of Periodontitis severity and extent: bias magnitudes, sensibility, and specificity. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac . 2018;59(3):145-153

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Publisher

Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária

Altmetrics