Repository logo
 
Publication

Remission versus low disease activity as treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis: how to strike the right balance between too strict and too lenient targets? A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data

dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Cátia
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Johannes W.G.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Ricardo J.O.
dc.contributor.authorWelsing, Paco M.J.
dc.contributor.authorGossec, Laure
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Pedro M.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heijde, Désirée
dc.contributor.authorSilva, José António Pereira da
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-31T13:19:21Z
dc.date.available2025-03-31T13:19:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the impact of using Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-LDA (low disease activity) versus different definitions of remission as a treatment target in established rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data from eight randomised controlled trials was performed. Four definitions of the target were considered at 6 months: (1) SDAI-LDA: SDAI≤11; (2) SDAI-Remission: SDAI≤3.3; (3) 4V-Remission: Tender and swollen 28-joint counts and C reactive protein (mg/dL) all ≤1 and patient global assessment (PGA)≤2 and (4) 3-variable (3V)-Remission: as 4V, excluding PGA. The mean radiographic change in the modified total Sharp-van der Heijde score (mTSS) and the Good Radiographic Outcome rates (defined as a change of ≤0.5 units mTSS) over 2 years were compared among target definitions. Radiographic progression and the distribution of the individual criteria of the Boolean definition in the only LDA subgroup (3.3<SDAI≤11) were analysed. Results: In total, 4374 patients (mean disease duration of 5.9 years (95% CI 4.6; 7.1)) were included. The pooled rate of SDAI-LDA at 6 months was 49%, with 13% in SDAI-remission. The 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission were achieved by 16% and 23%, respectively. Mean radiographic progression was 0.55 (0.14; 0.96) units for SDAI-LDA and 0.22 (-0.09; 0.54), 0.28 (-0.07; 0.62), 0.28 (-0.10; 0.65) for SDAI-Remission, 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission states, respectively. Patients with SDAI Pure-LDA presented significantly more radiographic progression than patients in SDAI-Remission (mean 0.72 vs 0.22 units, p<0.05). Over 53% of all patients achieving SDAI-LDA were not in 3V-Remission and had more mean radiographic progression over 2 years than those who met both targets (0.70 vs 0.25 units, p=0.014). Among patients with SDAI-LDA but not in SDAI-Remission, 40% scored PGA>2, reflecting relevant disease impact. Conclusion: SDAI-LDA is associated with more structural damage over 2 years than any of the definitions of remission. It also allows substantial disease impact to go unchecked and uncontrolled. Physicians should strive for remission whenever possible and safe while also taking into account the different individual disease activity parameters included in the adopted definition.eng
dc.identifier.citationDuarte, C., Jacobs, J. W. G., Ferreira, R. J. O., Welsing, P. M. J., Gossec, L., Machado, P. M., van der Heijde, D., & da Silva, J. A. P. (2024). Remission versus low disease activity as treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis: how to strike the right balance between too strict and too lenient targets? A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data. RMD open, 10(4), e004387. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004387
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004387
dc.identifier.issn2056-5933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/57505
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/4/e004387.long
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectHealth care
dc.subjectPatiente reported outcome measures
dc.subjectRheumatoid arthritis
dc.titleRemission versus low disease activity as treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis: how to strike the right balance between too strict and too lenient targets? A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient dataeng
dc.typeArtigo científico
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPagee004387
oaire.citation.titleRMD Open: Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases
oaire.citation.volume10
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
e004387.full.pdf
Size:
578.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: