Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
Abstract(s)
Este estudo analisa a cobertura mediática do conflito Rússia-Ucrânia em três jornais portugueses no formato digital: Correio da Manhã, Expresso e Público. O objetivo é investigar as diferentes narrativas mediáticas, os enquadramentos ideológicos e as estratégias discursivas predominantes em cada jornal. Com recurso à metodologia da Análise Crítica do Discurso (ACD) de Teun A. van Dijk (2015, 2017) e ao modelo de análise de conteúdo em ambiente web proposto por Cunha e Peixinho (2020), foi criada uma grelha de análise para examinar o conteúdo de 121 artigos. Para abordar a questão da desinformação nos media tradicionais, foram considerados estudos de Zhang et al. (2018), Carvalho et al. (2021) e Danila et al. (2022), que investigaram a credibilidade do conteúdo noticioso através de um conjunto de indicadores.
Os resultados revelam que o Correio da Manhã adota uma narrativa emocional e sensacionalista, centrando-se em histórias humanitárias e tragédias pessoais. O Expresso segue uma abordagem moralizante, destacando a resistência ucraniana e enquadrando o conflito como uma luta pela liberdade. O Público, por sua vez, oferece uma análise mais técnica e geopolítica, evitando apelos emocionais.
A ausência de fact-checking em todas as notícias analisadas constitui uma descoberta crítica, refletindo desafios significativos para o jornalismo de qualidade em tempos de desinformação. Esta falta de verificação rigorosa pode comprometer a confiança do público nos media e contribuir para a proliferação de desinformação. A pesquisa também destaca a importância da literacia mediática para capacitar os cidadãos a avaliar criticamente as informações consumidas.
As conclusões sugerem que as escolhas editoriais dos jornais moldam significativamente as perceções públicas sobre o conflito, com implicações profundas para a formação de opiniões. A diversidade de estratégias editoriais e a ausência de fact-checking sublinham a necessidade de práticas jornalísticas mais rigorosas e éticas, especialmente em contextos de crise global.
This study analyses the media coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in three Portuguese newspapers in digital format: Correio da Manhã, Expresso, and Público. The aim is to investigate the different media narratives, ideological frameworks, and discursive strategies which predominate in each newspaper. Using Teun A. van Dijk (2015, 2017) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodology and the web content analysis model proposed by Cunha and Peixinho (2020), an analysis grid was created to examine the content of 121 articles. To address the issue of misinformation in traditional media, studies by Zhang et al. (2018), Carvalho et al. (2021), and Danila et al. (2022) were considered, which investigated the credibility of news content through a set of indicators. The results show that Correio da Manhã adopts an emotional and sensationalist narrative, focusing on humanitarian stories and personal tragedies. Expresso follows a moralising approach, highlighting Ukrainian resistance and framing the conflict as a struggle for freedom. Público, on the other hand offers a more technical and geopolitical analysis, avoiding emotional appeals. The absence of fact-checking in all the news articles analysed is a critical finding, reflecting significant challenges for quality journalism in times of disinformation. This lack of rigorous verification can undermine public trust in the media, and contribute to the proliferation of disinformation. The research also highlights the importance of media literacy to empower citizens to critically evaluate the information they consume. The findings suggest that newspapers' editorial choices significantly shape public perceptions of the conflict, with profound implications for opinion formation. The diversity of editorial strategies and the absence of fact-checking underline the need for more rigorous and ethical journalistic practices, especially in contexts of global crisis.
This study analyses the media coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in three Portuguese newspapers in digital format: Correio da Manhã, Expresso, and Público. The aim is to investigate the different media narratives, ideological frameworks, and discursive strategies which predominate in each newspaper. Using Teun A. van Dijk (2015, 2017) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodology and the web content analysis model proposed by Cunha and Peixinho (2020), an analysis grid was created to examine the content of 121 articles. To address the issue of misinformation in traditional media, studies by Zhang et al. (2018), Carvalho et al. (2021), and Danila et al. (2022) were considered, which investigated the credibility of news content through a set of indicators. The results show that Correio da Manhã adopts an emotional and sensationalist narrative, focusing on humanitarian stories and personal tragedies. Expresso follows a moralising approach, highlighting Ukrainian resistance and framing the conflict as a struggle for freedom. Público, on the other hand offers a more technical and geopolitical analysis, avoiding emotional appeals. The absence of fact-checking in all the news articles analysed is a critical finding, reflecting significant challenges for quality journalism in times of disinformation. This lack of rigorous verification can undermine public trust in the media, and contribute to the proliferation of disinformation. The research also highlights the importance of media literacy to empower citizens to critically evaluate the information they consume. The findings suggest that newspapers' editorial choices significantly shape public perceptions of the conflict, with profound implications for opinion formation. The diversity of editorial strategies and the absence of fact-checking underline the need for more rigorous and ethical journalistic practices, especially in contexts of global crisis.
Description
Keywords
Discurso mediático Media digitais Desinformação Representações sociais Análise crítica do discurso Guerra Rússia-Ucrânia Ideologia