A carregar...
Publicação
Precisão de impressões de implantes : convencional versus digital
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A constante evolução tecnológica, tem-se revelado um grande aliado nas diversas
áreas da medicina dentária. O surgimento e desenvolvimento da tecnológica CAD/CAM
(Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing) com inicio na década de 80,
despertou uma nova realidade na prática clínica diária.
A verdadeira finalidade da introdução desta tecnologia, é potencializar a consulta,
otimizando o procedimento de impressões intraorais.
Com as novas tecnologias emergentes, prevê-se que a medicina dentária seja guiada por esta vaga tecnológica, que dá lugar a esta nova era digital.
Será que estes novos dispositivos irão mudar o paradigma na toma e impressões de implantes?
O propósito deste trabalho, é explanar duas técnicas distintas de impressões de implantes, convencional e digital, posicionando as recentes tecnologias que surgem no
mercado, comparando-as às técnicas consideradas mais tradicionais, tendo em
consideração aspetos como: procedimento, técnica, conforto, preferência, tempo de
consulta e custos de produção, avaliando tanto na perspetiva do doente, como do
operador. Neste contexto, pretende-se com esta monografia concluir, se existe evidência
científica que valide e que confirme a existência de vantagens quando comparadas estas duas técnicas.
Esta avaliação será executada a partir de uma pesquisa bibliográfica, assente em
artigos disponíveis nas bases de dados Cochrane Library , Medline/Pubmed, Scielo,
Google Scholar e B-on, dando prioridade a artigos referentes aos últimos 10 anos.
The constant technological evolution has proved to be a great ally in the different areas of dental medicine. The emergence and development of CAD / CAM (Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Manufacturing) technology since the 1980s, has awakened a new reality in daily clinical practice. The real purpose introducing this technology in dentistry, is to potentialize every consultation, optimizing the procedure of intraoral impressions. With new technologies emerging, dental medicine is expected to be guided by this digital wave, which gives rise to this new technological / digital era. Will these new devices change the paradigm in implant impression? The purpose of this master thesis is to expose two different techniques, of implant impression, conventional and digital, positioning the recent technologies that appear on the market, comparing them to more traditional techniques, taking into account factors such as: procedure, technique, comfort and preference for both the patient and the operator, consultation time, production costs. In this context, it is intended to conclude whether there is scientific evidence, so that it can be said that there are advantages when comparing these two techniques. This evaluation will be carried out based on a bibliographic search, based on articles available in the Medline / Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar e B-on databases, giving priority to articles referring to the last 10 years.
The constant technological evolution has proved to be a great ally in the different areas of dental medicine. The emergence and development of CAD / CAM (Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Manufacturing) technology since the 1980s, has awakened a new reality in daily clinical practice. The real purpose introducing this technology in dentistry, is to potentialize every consultation, optimizing the procedure of intraoral impressions. With new technologies emerging, dental medicine is expected to be guided by this digital wave, which gives rise to this new technological / digital era. Will these new devices change the paradigm in implant impression? The purpose of this master thesis is to expose two different techniques, of implant impression, conventional and digital, positioning the recent technologies that appear on the market, comparing them to more traditional techniques, taking into account factors such as: procedure, technique, comfort and preference for both the patient and the operator, consultation time, production costs. In this context, it is intended to conclude whether there is scientific evidence, so that it can be said that there are advantages when comparing these two techniques. This evaluation will be carried out based on a bibliographic search, based on articles available in the Medline / Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar e B-on databases, giving priority to articles referring to the last 10 years.
Descrição
Dissertação para obtenção do grau de Mestre no Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz
Palavras-chave
Técnicas de impressão de implantes Técnica convencional de impressão de implantes Técnica digital de impressão de implantes Scanner digital intraoral