Loading...
Publication
Avaliação da Formação dos Cursos de Scie para Autores de Projetos e Medidas de Autoproteção de 3ª E 4ª Categoria de Riscos
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.06 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Resumo
A presente dissertação teve como objetivo avaliar a formação dos cursos de
Segurança Contra Incêndios em Edifícios para autores de projetos e medidas de
autoproteção da 3.ª e 4.ª categoria de risco de modo a aferir a adequação da formação
e quais as necessidades de melhoria.
Para elaboração dessa avaliação, foi realizado um levantamento da listagem de
autores de projetos e medidas de autoproteção, entidades formadoras, formadores e
coordenadores de curso junto da ANPC, e posteriormente, remetido a cada um, um
inquérito por questionário, permitindo assim avaliar qual o impacto da formação em
cada um dos grupos inquiridos.
A análise foi realizada através da estatística descritiva, com recurso às funções
estatísticas do Microsoft Excel 2007 e ao programa SPSS. Através desses resultados foi
possível proceder à validação das três hipóteses inicialmente definidas, validando que
os cursos são adequados, possuem oportunidades de melhoria e é possível identificar
as principais oportunidades de melhoria, na perspetiva das partes interessadas.
A taxa de respostas ao inquérito por parte dos formandos foi a única considerada
aceitável, correspondendo a um erro de amostra para um intervalo de confiança de
95% inferior a 10%, o mesmo não se verificou com os restantes grupos de inquiridos,
o que limitou a representatividade.
Contudo, foi possível aferir que no geral a ação de formação é considerada
adequada pelos grupos inquiridos, embora apresente também necessidades de
melhoria.
Abstract The objective of this dissertation was to evaluate the training of Fire Safety courses in buildings for project authors and self-protection measures of the 3rd and 4th category of risk in order to assess the adequacy of the training and the needs for improvement. In order to prepare this evaluation, a survey of the authors of projects and selfprotection measures, training entities, trainers and course coordinators was carried out with the ANPC, and afterwards, a questionnaire survey was sent to each one. impact of training in each of the groups surveyed. The analysis was performed through descriptive statistics, using the statistical functions of Microsoft Excel 2007 and the SPSS program. Through these results, it was possible to validate the three hypotheses initially defined, validating that the courses are adequate, have opportunities for improvement and it is possible to identify the main opportunities for improvement from the perspective of the interested parties. The rate of survey responses by the trainees was the only one considered acceptable, corresponding to a sample error for a 95% confidence interval of less than 10%, the same did not occur with the remaining groups of respondents, which limited the representativeness. However, it was possible to verify that in general the training action is considered adequate by the groups interviewed, although it also presents needs for improvement.
Abstract The objective of this dissertation was to evaluate the training of Fire Safety courses in buildings for project authors and self-protection measures of the 3rd and 4th category of risk in order to assess the adequacy of the training and the needs for improvement. In order to prepare this evaluation, a survey of the authors of projects and selfprotection measures, training entities, trainers and course coordinators was carried out with the ANPC, and afterwards, a questionnaire survey was sent to each one. impact of training in each of the groups surveyed. The analysis was performed through descriptive statistics, using the statistical functions of Microsoft Excel 2007 and the SPSS program. Through these results, it was possible to validate the three hypotheses initially defined, validating that the courses are adequate, have opportunities for improvement and it is possible to identify the main opportunities for improvement from the perspective of the interested parties. The rate of survey responses by the trainees was the only one considered acceptable, corresponding to a sample error for a 95% confidence interval of less than 10%, the same did not occur with the remaining groups of respondents, which limited the representativeness. However, it was possible to verify that in general the training action is considered adequate by the groups interviewed, although it also presents needs for improvement.
Description
Keywords
SCIE; MAP; Projetos; Autores; Avaliação da Formação SCIE; MAP; Project; Authors; Training Evaluation