Repository logo
 
Publication

Quantification of color variation of restorative materials used on pediatric dentistry after pigmentation

dc.contributor.authorLopes, Luísa Bandeira Pires Monteiro
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Andreia Sofia Lopes de
dc.contributor.authorMilagre, Virgínia Barreiros
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-04T15:40:03Z
dc.date.available2016-04-04T15:40:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.pt_PT
dc.description.abstract"Objective To quantify the color variation of two glass ionomer cements and a composite resin used in pediatric dentistry, after being immersed in different pigments agents. Methods Using two glass ionomer cements (Ketac™ Molar and Photac™ Fil) and a microhybrid composite resin (Filtek™ z250), were produced 40 disks of each material (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick). The samples were soaked in artificial saliva (control group), coke, peach Ice Tea® and chocolate milk, for 72 hours in an oven at 37ºC. After this period, the samples were washed in 50 ml of distilled water. Finally, using the spectrophotometer, it was made the reading of results. The color change was measured according to the CIE L * a * b * system. Color changes were statistically analyzed using parametric one-way ANOVA and ANOVA with Welch correction, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc Tukey and Dunnet T3 with p≤ 0.05. Results The immersion of restorative materials in different pigmentation agents caused a significant color variation on the samples. The agent who presented higher results was the Peach Ice Tea®. The chocolate milk was the fluid with lowest pigmentation capacity of all restorative materials under study. The greater color variation was found on the Ketac™ Molar submerged in Coca-Cola® and the smallest on the Filtek™ z250 in chocolate milk. Conclusion All restorative materials were shown to be susceptible to pigmentation by all agents. The Filtek™ z250 proved to have better color stability, followed by Photac™ Fil and finally by Ketac™ Molar."pt_PT
dc.identifier.citationRGO, Rev Gaúch Odontol, Porto Alegre, v.63, n.4, p. 383-388, out./dez., 2015pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1981-863720150003000022935pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/12872
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSciELO (Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic)pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720150003000022935pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectComposite resinspt_PT
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cementspt_PT
dc.subjectPigmentationpt_PT
dc.titleQuantification of color variation of restorative materials used on pediatric dentistry after pigmentationpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlacePorto Alegre, Brasilpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage388pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage383pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRGO, Revista Gaúcha de Odontologiapt_PT
oaire.citation.volume63(4)pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
artigo01_ProfLLopes.pdf
Size:
679.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: