Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivos: Esta investigação visa analisar e comparar a perceção de Médicos Dentistas Especialistas em Ortodontia, Médicos Dentistas Generalistas e indivíduos leigos quanto à assimetria facial, particularmente em relação ao desvio da mandíbula (laterognatia) e inclinação do plano labial.
Materiais e Métodos: Faces do sexo feminino e masculino construídas no programa Character Creator 4® foram manipuladas para simular 2, 4 e 6 milímetros de laterognatia e 1.5º, 3º e 4.5º de inclinação do plano labial. Posteriormente, foram avaliadas por Ortodontistas, Médicos Dentistas Generalistas e leigos através de um questionário online. Solicitou-se aos participantes que avaliassem cada face numa escala numérica de 0 a 10 e as ordenassem por ordem de preferência estética. Os dados foram analisados no programa IBM SPSS Statistics®, através de técnicas de análise estatística descritiva e inferencial com um nível de significância de 5% (p<0.05).
Resultados: Na maioria das faces, verificou-se uma diminuição progressiva na avaliação estética à medida que o grau de assimetria aumentou. Os Ortodontistas atribuíram pontuações significativamente superiores às faces feminina (p<0.001) e masculina (p=0.013) simétricas em comparação com os leigos. Nas faces com 1.5º de inclinação do plano labial, os leigos atribuíram pontuações significativamente inferiores às dos Ortodontistas nas faces feminina (p=0.006) e masculina (p=0.002). Os três grupos, de um modo geral, foram unânimes na perceção da inclinação do plano labial a partir dos 3º.
Conclusões: Os Ortodontistas possuem uma capacidade superior no reconhecimento da simetria facial relativamente aos leigos. No entanto, os leigos percecionam a laterognatia mais precocemente que os Ortodontistas e Médicos Dentistas Generalistas. Para os três grupos estudados, a inclinação do plano labial e a laterognatia tiveram um diferente impacto estético. Constatou-se que o sexo e o tempo de experiência profissional não tiveram influência significativa na perceção das assimetrias faciais analisadas.
Aims: This study aims to analyze and compare the perception of Orthodontists, General Dentists and laypeople regarding facial asymmetry, particularly in relation to mandibular deviation (laterognathia) and lip-line canting. Materials and Methods: Female and male faces created using the Character Creator 4® software were manipulated to simulate 2, 4 and 6 millimeters of laterognathia and 1.5º, 3º, and 4.5º of lip-line canting. These faces were evaluated by Orthodontists, General Dentists and laypersons through an online questionnaire. Participants were asked to rate each face on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10 and to rank them according to their aesthetic preference. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics®, employing both descriptive and inferential statistical methods with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: In general, there was a progressive decrease in aesthetics ratings as the degree of asymmetry increased. Orthodontists gave significantly higher scores to both symmetrical female (p<0.001) and male (p=0.013) faces compared to laypeople. In faces with a 1.5º lip-line canting, laypeople rated both the female (p=0.006) and the male (p=0.002) faces significantly lower than Orthodontists. The three groups were generally unanimous in perceiving lip-line canting from 3º onwards. Conclusion: Orthodontists demonstrated a superior ability to recognize facial symmetry compared to laypeople. However, laypeople detected laterognathia earlier than Orthodontists and General Dentists. For all three groups, lip-line canting and laterognathia had a different aesthetic impact. It was also found that neither gender nor professional experience had a significant influence on the perception of the facial asymmetry types analyzed.
Aims: This study aims to analyze and compare the perception of Orthodontists, General Dentists and laypeople regarding facial asymmetry, particularly in relation to mandibular deviation (laterognathia) and lip-line canting. Materials and Methods: Female and male faces created using the Character Creator 4® software were manipulated to simulate 2, 4 and 6 millimeters of laterognathia and 1.5º, 3º, and 4.5º of lip-line canting. These faces were evaluated by Orthodontists, General Dentists and laypersons through an online questionnaire. Participants were asked to rate each face on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10 and to rank them according to their aesthetic preference. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics®, employing both descriptive and inferential statistical methods with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: In general, there was a progressive decrease in aesthetics ratings as the degree of asymmetry increased. Orthodontists gave significantly higher scores to both symmetrical female (p<0.001) and male (p=0.013) faces compared to laypeople. In faces with a 1.5º lip-line canting, laypeople rated both the female (p=0.006) and the male (p=0.002) faces significantly lower than Orthodontists. The three groups were generally unanimous in perceiving lip-line canting from 3º onwards. Conclusion: Orthodontists demonstrated a superior ability to recognize facial symmetry compared to laypeople. However, laypeople detected laterognathia earlier than Orthodontists and General Dentists. For all three groups, lip-line canting and laterognathia had a different aesthetic impact. It was also found that neither gender nor professional experience had a significant influence on the perception of the facial asymmetry types analyzed.
Description
Dissertação para obtenção do grau de Mestre no Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz
Keywords
Assimetria facial Perceção Laterognatia Inclinação do plano labial