Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Living with pain : a systematic review on patients’ subjective experiences

datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorChristidis, Maria
dc.contributor.authorAl-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorMiah, Tasnim
dc.contributor.authorMihasi, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRazavian, Artin
dc.contributor.authorChristidis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorCanales, Giancarlo De la Torre
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-13T11:47:27Z
dc.date.available2026-05-13T11:47:27Z
dc.date.issued2025-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding the subjective experiences of patients living with chronic, acute, and cancer pain can significantly enhance the selection of treatment approaches, care, and support, ultimately improving their quality of life. This qualitative systematic review aimed to analyze if the patients’ subjective experiences of living with pain differ between acute, chronic, and cancer pain states. Methods: After registration in PROSPERO (CRD42023491745), an electronic search was conducted in the databases Medline (Ovid), Embase (embase.com), Cochrane (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from their inception to 19 April 2024. Out of 8443 articles, 62 articles were included. The inclusion criteria that were applied were as follows: (1) participants aged 18 or older; and (2) participants’ subjective experiences of chronic, acute, or cancer pain. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) studies presented in other languages than English, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, and Scandinavian languages; (b) editorials, letters, legal cases, case series, and case-control studies; (c) studies and articles based on duplicated data; (d) study population with ages below 18 years. Forty-four articles regarding chronic pain, thirteen regarding cancer pain, and five regarding acute pain were included. Methodological limitations were assessed using the CASP tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE-CERQual. All included studies showed moderate (n = 18) to high (n = 44) confidence. Results: Based on the qualitative synthesis in GRADE-CERQual, four main themes were identified: (1) impact of pain on social life, work life, and family life; (2) challenges in healthcare access; (3) psychological impact and emotional struggles from pain; and (4) barriers to effective pain management. Conclusions: Taken together, patients with chronic, acute, or cancer pain face challenges in social, work, and personal lives. They often lack recognition and support from healthcare providers, relying on self-managed methods and facing barriers to effective management. Therefore, future research examining how the different pain types affect the lives of the patients and at the same time exploring personalized and collaborative treatment approaches is warranted. In conclusion, patients’ experiences of living with pain remain unexplored in clinical practice. Understanding the impact of various pain types on mental health, self-esteem, daily life, and relationships is crucial. Also, how personalized treatments, collaborative healthcare access, and long-term management strategies can improve quality of life for patients living with pain.eng
dc.identifier.citationChristidis, M., Al-Moraissi, E.A., Miah, T. et al. Living with pain—a systematic review on patients’ subjective experiences. Syst Rev 14, 188 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02953-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-025-02953-6
dc.identifier.issn2046-4053
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/63104
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02953-6
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectchronic pain
dc.subjectacute pain
dc.subjectcancer pain
dc.subjectpatient experiences
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.titleLiving with pain : a systematic review on patients’ subjective experienceseng
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.startPage188
oaire.citation.titleSystematic Reviews
oaire.citation.volume14
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo_GDeLaTorreCanales_2025_09.pdf
Tamanho:
1.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.85 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: