| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O artigo analisou a interseção entre perceções públicas sobre imigração e políticas de segurança em Portugal. Partiu da ideia de que a imigração era estrutural e benéfica para
demografia, economia e cultura, mas identificou uma dissonância entre dados objetivos e perceções que simplificavam a relação com a imigração. Com base em literatura, estatísticas, barómetros de opinião, estudos de perceção e documentação técnico-operacional, aplicou codificação temática, recodificação retardada e matrizes de ameaça-mitigação. Os resultados mostraram que atitudes negativas assentavam em perceções de ameaças realista e simbólica, amplificadas por enquadramentos mediáticos e políticos.
Em Portugal, coexistiram reconhecimento dos contributos económicos dos imigrantes e receios culturais, a par de crenças incorretas sobre criminalidade e custos
sociais. No plano policial, apesar de avanços no policiamento de proximidade, persistiram excesso de reatividade e limitada cobertura das comunidades migrantes. O estudo propôs reforçar a eficácia da prevenção criminal, criando um programa específico para comunidades migrantes com mediadores, sectorização inteligente e patrulhamento orientado para problemas, adotar novas políticas de recrutamento e progressão que aumentassem a diversidade e instituir um ecossistema “Mito vs. Dado” com divulgação regular de indicadores. Concluiu que governar pertenças, e não apenas fluxos, alinhava segurança objetiva e subjetiva, reduzia polarização e reforçava a confiança democrática.
The article analyzed the intersection between public perceptions of immigration and security policies in Portugal. It started from the premise that immigration was structural and beneficial for demography, the economy, and culture, but identified a dissonance between objective data and perceptions that oversimplified the relationship with immigration. Drawing on academic literature, statistics, opinion barometers, perception studies, and technical-operational documentation, it applied thematic coding, delayed recoding, and threat–mitigation matrices. The results showed that negative attitudes rested on perceptions of both realistic and symbolic threats, amplified by media and political framing. In Portugal, recognition of immigrants economic contributions coexisted with cultural anxieties, alongside incorrect beliefs about crime and social costs. At the policing level, despite advances in community policing, excessive reactivity and limited coverage of migrant communities persisted. The study proposed strengthening effective crime prevention by creating a dedicated program for migrant communities with mediators, smart sectorization, and problem-oriented patrol; adopting new recruitment and promotion policies to increase internal diversity; and establishing a “Myth vs. Data” public communication ecosystem with regular publication of indicators. It concluded that governing belonging, not just flows, aligned objective and subjective security, reduced polarization, and reinforced democratic trust.
The article analyzed the intersection between public perceptions of immigration and security policies in Portugal. It started from the premise that immigration was structural and beneficial for demography, the economy, and culture, but identified a dissonance between objective data and perceptions that oversimplified the relationship with immigration. Drawing on academic literature, statistics, opinion barometers, perception studies, and technical-operational documentation, it applied thematic coding, delayed recoding, and threat–mitigation matrices. The results showed that negative attitudes rested on perceptions of both realistic and symbolic threats, amplified by media and political framing. In Portugal, recognition of immigrants economic contributions coexisted with cultural anxieties, alongside incorrect beliefs about crime and social costs. At the policing level, despite advances in community policing, excessive reactivity and limited coverage of migrant communities persisted. The study proposed strengthening effective crime prevention by creating a dedicated program for migrant communities with mediators, smart sectorization, and problem-oriented patrol; adopting new recruitment and promotion policies to increase internal diversity; and establishing a “Myth vs. Data” public communication ecosystem with regular publication of indicators. It concluded that governing belonging, not just flows, aligned objective and subjective security, reduced polarization, and reinforced democratic trust.
Descrição
Trabalho individual do Curso de Comando e Direção Policial.
Palavras-chave
imigração perceções públicas prevenção criminal immigration public perceptions crime prevention
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
Licença CC
Sem licença CC
