Repository logo
 
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Gender Inequalities in the Military Service: A Systematic Literature Review

Use this identifier to reference this record.
Name:Description:Size:Format: 
10.1007s12119-019-09662-y.pdf827.46 KBAdobe PDF Download

Advisor(s)

Abstract(s)

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the literature regarding gender inequalities in the military service. In doing so, it discloses challenges and opportunities for women’s integration and finds new avenues for future research. Recent scientific research has evidenced that women still represent a growing minority in most Western militaries. Women’s integration deserves equal opportunities across all branches and levels of responsibility in the military, however, their expansion to ground combat roles is still a challenge to the military and policy-makers. Scholars have also reported about the decision to increase the number of women in combat roles, as it may potentiate adverse experiences, due to closer proximity to men in circumstances with little or no privacy. Conversely, scientific research has shown that more egalitarian women reported significantly less sexual harassment victimization. Furthermore, our insights suggest that it might be fruitful to integrate women in ground combat roles as special forces’ operators, with a view to induce a reduction of marginalization and sexual harassment, by gaining respect in a male-dominant culture. The presented idea should be interpreted with caution and needs to be supported by empirical research; although we are convinced that future research will be revealing and might represent a game-changing situation to women inequalities in the armed forces.

Description

Keywords

Gender Women Inequalities Military Army Systematic literature review Special operations forces Ground combat Sexual harassment

Pedagogical Context

Citation

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Publisher

CC License

Altmetrics

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 20
  • Captures
    • Readers: 82
  • Social Media
    • Shares, Likes & Comments: 72
see details