| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O plano nacional de segurança operacional, impõe que todos os prestadores de
serviços, de aviação civil, implementem um Safety Management System (SMS). A Força
Aérea (FA) como prestadora de serviços, à aviação civil, nas missões de Busca e Salvamento
deve garantir um nível de segurança equivalente ao previsto nas normas civis.
Adicionalmente a ratificação da STANAG 7160, por Portugal, impõe a implementação de
um sistema equivalente ao SMS, proposto no Anexo 19 da ICAO.
O presente trabalho analisa os atuais processos de segurança de voo da FA,
particularizando para as Esquadras de Voo 502 e 751, através do gap analysis, e os processos
de outros operadores identificando medidas, que poderão ser adotadas nas Esquadras em
apreço.
A investigação segue um raciocínio indutivo, assente numa estratégia de análise
qualitativa e num desenho de pesquisa de tipo estudo de caso centrado na atualidade da FA.
Efetivamente, existe a necessidade de elaborar uma política de segurança, e investir na
gestão do risco e na garantia da segurança para adequação ao SMS, sendo sugeridas algumas
medidas de implementação.
Conclui-se que estão reunidas as condições para a implementação do SMS, sendo um
grande contributo para a melhoria da segurança de voo.
The State Safety Plan (SSP) requires, all civil aviation service providers, the implementation of a Safety Management System (SMS). Being, the Portuguese Air Force (PoAF) the service provider for the national Search and Rescue missions, it must guarantee a level of safety assurance equivalent to that demanded for the civil regulations. In addition, the ratification of STANAG 7160, by Portugal, requires the implementation of a similar system proposed in the ICAO Annex 19. This study analyzes the PoAF current flight safety processes, for the Flight Squadrons 502 and 751, through a gap analysis that allows to identify process gaps considering SMS. Other operators’ methodologies are analyzed, in order to identify measures that could be adopted at PoAF. The research follows an inductive reasoning, based on a qualitative analysis strategy and a case study research design centered on the current time. There is a need to develop a safety policy, to invest in risk management and in the safety assurance for adequacy to the SMS, with some measures for implementation being suggested. It is concluded that there are conditions for the implementation of SMS, at PoAF, which will make a major contribution to improve the overall flight safety.
The State Safety Plan (SSP) requires, all civil aviation service providers, the implementation of a Safety Management System (SMS). Being, the Portuguese Air Force (PoAF) the service provider for the national Search and Rescue missions, it must guarantee a level of safety assurance equivalent to that demanded for the civil regulations. In addition, the ratification of STANAG 7160, by Portugal, requires the implementation of a similar system proposed in the ICAO Annex 19. This study analyzes the PoAF current flight safety processes, for the Flight Squadrons 502 and 751, through a gap analysis that allows to identify process gaps considering SMS. Other operators’ methodologies are analyzed, in order to identify measures that could be adopted at PoAF. The research follows an inductive reasoning, based on a qualitative analysis strategy and a case study research design centered on the current time. There is a need to develop a safety policy, to invest in risk management and in the safety assurance for adequacy to the SMS, with some measures for implementation being suggested. It is concluded that there are conditions for the implementation of SMS, at PoAF, which will make a major contribution to improve the overall flight safety.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Garantia de segurança Gestão do risco Política de segurança Segurança de voo Promoção da segurança Sistema de Gestão Operacional Flight safety Safety assurance Safety Management System Safety policy Safety promotion Risk management