Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Comparing ready-to-use and powder abobotulinumtoxinA for glabellar lines : a randomized, controlled, triple-blinded clinical trial

datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorSilva Junior, Silvio Ventura da
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Maria Luiza Boechat Borges
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Ayala, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorCebola, Pedro Miguel Teixeira Carvas
dc.contributor.authorCarbone, Ana Claudia
dc.contributor.authorCâmara-Souza, Mariana Barbosa
dc.contributor.authorPoluha, Rodrigo Lorenzi
dc.contributor.authorCanales, Giancarlo De la Torre
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-30T13:38:47Z
dc.date.available2026-04-30T13:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.description.abstractBackground: Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is the most used procedure to treat glabellar lines; however, limited data exist about the effectiveness of ready-to-use BoNT-A (RTUaboBoNT-A) for this indication. Aims: This study compared the efficacy, durability, and safety of RTUaboBoNT-A for moderate and severe glabellar wrinkles. Methods: This randomized triple-blinded trial included 38 male volunteers aged between 25 and 50 years. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A, n = 18) and RTUaboBoNT-A (n = 20). Groups received 10 U for procerus muscle and 20 U for the corrugator muscle. Assessed variables included, electromyography activity (EMG), Merz 5-point glabellar lines scale, FACE-Q appraisal for lines between the eyebrows and Visual Analogue Scale for pain intensity. Assessments were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after injections. For differences in EMG and satisfaction scores, the two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc analyses were conducted. Wrinkle severity scores were analyzed with the chi-squared test. Results: Inter-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in EMG scores in all assessed periods for the corrugator supercili (p = 0.11) and the procerus muscles (p = 0.93); for severity of glabellar lines, no significant differences were also found in all follow-ups for rest (p = 0.737) and contracted position (p = 0.390), as well as for satisfaction with the treatments. However, the RTUaboBoNT-A group presented higher levels of pain intensity during the injection procedure (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The RTUaboBoNT-A and aboBoNT-A are comparable in efficacy, durability, and safety.eng
dc.identifier.citationS. V.daSilva Junior, M. L. B.Borges Neves, A.Sanchez-Ayala, et al., “Comparing Ready-to-Use and Powder AbobotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blinded Clinical Trial,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 24, no. 7 (2025): e70308, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70308.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.70308
dc.identifier.issn1473-2165
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/62967
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70308
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectabobotulinumtoxinA
dc.subjectbotulinum toxin type A
dc.subjectglabellar wrinkles
dc.subjectready-to- use abobotulinumtoxinA
dc.titleComparing ready-to-use and powder abobotulinumtoxinA for glabellar lines : a randomized, controlled, triple-blinded clinical trialeng
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPagee70308
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology
oaire.citation.volume24
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo_GDeLaTorreCanales_2025_04.pdf
Tamanho:
838.17 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.85 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: