Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Comparative analysis of endodontic 0.15 stainless-steel K-files : exploring design, composition, and mechanical performance

datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorBaruwa, Abayomi Omokeji
dc.contributor.authorChasqueira, Filipa
dc.contributor.authorArantes-Oliveira, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorCaramês, João
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Duarte
dc.contributor.authorPortugal, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Jorge N. R.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-23T11:42:57Z
dc.date.available2026-03-23T11:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.description.abstractTo establish a glide path, smaller files (up to size 0.15) with tapers of 2% are commonly used as pathfinding files. They pre-shape the root canal space before transitioning to larger taper endodontic instruments, aiming to prevent procedural errors. This study aimed to compare the design, metal wire composition, and mechanical characteristics of seven different ISO size 15 stainless-steel hand files (K-File and C-File+). Ninety-one new stainless-steel ISO 15 K-files were mechanically tested. All files were inspected for deformations before the assessment. Dental operating microscope, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and optical microscope analyses were conducted on four randomly selected instruments from each group, and two instruments per group underwent an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. Buckling mechanical tests were performed using an Instron universal testing machine, and microhardness was assessed using a Vickers hardness tester. The statistical analysis employed the nonparametric Mood’s median test, with a significance level set at 0.05. The instrument design analysis unveiled variations in the active blade area length and the number of spirals, while maintaining consistent cross-sections and symmetrical blades. Distinct tip geometries and surface irregularities were observed. While the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed similar compositions, the buckling strength and microhardness values exhibited variability across for all tested files. Notably, the Dentsply ReadySteel C-File+ recorded the highest buckling value (2.10 N), and the Dentsply ReadySteel K-File exhibited the lowest (1.00 N) (p < 0.05). Moreover, the Dentsply ReadySteel K-File recorded the highest microhardness value (703 HVN), while the SybronEndo Triple-Flex had the lowest (549 HVN) (p < 0.05). While similarities in cross-section design and metal wire composition were noted among the files, variations in the number of spirals and mechanical performance were also observed. Thus, all of these factors should be considered when selecting suitable files for an efficient root canal treatment.eng
dc.identifier.citationBaruwa AO, Chasqueira F, Arantes-Oliveira S, Caramês J, Marques D, Portugal J, Martins JNR. Comparative Analysis of Endodontic 0.15 Stainless-Steel K-Files: Exploring Design, Composition, and Mechanical Performance. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12020029
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj12020029
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/62347
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/dj12020029
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbuckling
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectglide path
dc.subjectmicrohardness
dc.subjectroot canal therapy
dc.titleComparative analysis of endodontic 0.15 stainless-steel K-files : exploring design, composition, and mechanical performanceeng
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage29
oaire.citation.titleDentistry Journal
oaire.citation.volume12
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo_FChasqueira_2024_01.pdf
Tamanho:
1.35 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.85 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: