Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Clinical supervision, as a formal process of monitoring professional
practice, aims to improve decision-making to contribute to safety and
quality of care through reflection processes and analysis of clinical
practice. This study aimed to compare the postoperative pain evaluation
and clinical recording procedures performed by nursing staff and clinical
supervisors in ambulatory surgery patients.
The study was integrated into the research project “SAFECARE”. It
was developed a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study in an
ambulatory surgery unit of a University Hospital in Oporto, Portugal.
The study population was the nursing staff with an intentional nonprobabilistic
sampling method. A questionnaire was constructed and
evaluation of postoperative pain, patient clinical and demographic
variables was included. This instrument was applied in 116 patients
matched by 12 surgical specialties. Results were compared between
nursing staff, clinical supervisors and electronic nursing records.
Patients had an average age of 48.6 years, being mostly female. Regarding
pain evaluation, the scale most used by nurses (62.1%) and clinical
supervisors (67.2%) was the “Numerical Scale”. Postoperative pain
evaluation scores ranged from 0 to 7, with score 0 (no pain) presenting
more frequently by nurses, electronic nursing records and clinical
supervisors. 34.5% of results were not documented in electronic nursing
records.
These findings support the importance of an intervention of clinical
supervision in the indicator “pain” for the outpatient surgery setting.
Local protocols of clinical supervision practice would contribute to
improve postoperative pain evaluation, as well as standardization and
optimization of nursing records, thus ensuring quality care.
Description
Keywords
Clinical Supervision in Nursing Pain Surgical Wound Ambulatory Surgery
Citation
Ambulatory Surgery, 26 (3): 58-62