Publicação
Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews on pediatric sedation in dentistry : an umbrella review
| datacite.subject.fos | Ciências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde | |
| datacite.subject.sdg | 03:Saúde de Qualidade | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marques, Carolina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dinis, Mafalda | |
| dc.contributor.author | Machado, Vanessa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Botelho, João | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lopes, Luísa Bandeira | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-30T14:40:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-30T14:40:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Sedation is a depression of a patient’s state of consciousness, induced by medications, that can reach different levels of intensity during a medical procedure. Conscious sedation produces a minimally depressed level of consciousness without impairment of the ability to maintain an open airway, of protective reflexes or of responses to verbal and physical stimulation. This umbrella review is aimed at critically assessing the available systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MA) on sedation in children/adolescents. An electronic database search was conducted that included Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, Scielo, Embase, LILACS and TRIP and the scope of which extended until January 2023. The risk of bias (RoB) of SRs was analyzed using the Measurement Tool to Assess SRs criteria 2 (AMSTAR2). Of 998 entries, 37 SRs were included. In terms of methodological quality, eight studies were assessed as having critically low quality, four studies had low quality, nine studies had moderate quality, and sixteen were considered to be of high quality. Based on the current guidelines, the most employed drugs in pediatric dentistry for sedation are nitrous oxide and midazolam; however, the available evidence supporting their use is insufficient and of low/critically low quality. The combined technique is recommended (nitrous oxide (30–50%) + midazolam). The optimal dose of oral midazolam is 0.75 mg/kg. The level of methodological quality of SRs is expected to increase according to the results and future directions of this umbrella review. | eng |
| dc.identifier.citation | Marques C, Dinis M, Machado V, Botelho J, Lopes LB. Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews on Pediatric Sedation in Dentistry: An Umbrella Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(12):3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123544 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm13123544 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/62538 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.relation.hasversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123544 | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | conscious sedation | |
| dc.subject | sedation | |
| dc.subject | pediatric | |
| dc.subject | paediatric | |
| dc.subject | systematic review | |
| dc.subject | meta-analysis | |
| dc.subject | pediatric dental procedure | |
| dc.subject | procedural sedation | |
| dc.subject | umbrella review | |
| dc.title | Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews on pediatric sedation in dentistry : an umbrella review | eng |
| dc.type | contribution to journal | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 12 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 3544 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Journal of Clinical Medicine | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 13 | |
| oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |