Publicação
Effect of suturing in root coverage via coronally advanced flaps : a systematic review
| datacite.subject.fos | Ciências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde | |
| datacite.subject.sdg | 03:Saúde de Qualidade | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ariceta, Alina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chambrone, Leandro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stuhr, Sandra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Couso-Queiruga, Emilio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-06T14:19:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-06T14:19:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: To analyze the evidence about the influence of the suturing technique and material in terms of the percentage of mean root coverage (%MRC) following root coverage therapy in teeth diagnosed with single/localized gingival recession defects (GRD) via a monolaminar coronally advanced flap. Methods: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024514043). A literature search was conducted to identify investigations that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Variables of interest were extracted, subsequently categorized, and qualitatively analyzed. Results: A total of 15 randomized clinical trials, including 301 localized GRD in non-molar sites classified as Miller class I-II/RT1, in 253 patients were included. The studies reporting the combination of sling and single interrupted sutures, or interrupted sutures alone showed an MRC of 70.2%±16.6%, and 74.1%±0.75%, respectively. The highest MRC was observed in the studies using polyglactin 910 with a pooled value of 76.6% ± 15.3%, and monofilament materials, with a pooled MRC of 74.8%±7.1%. When the suturing diameter was evaluated, the highest pooled MRC with values of 79.1%±9.8% was observed with the use of 5-0. Conclusions: For the treatment of single/localized GRD in non-molar sites via a monolaminar coronally advanced flap, the use of a combination of sling and single interrupted sutures, or single interrupted sutures, polyglactin 910 or monofilament materials, and material diameter of 5-0 showed a higher MRC as compared to the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, and silk with/without dressing, and other suture diameters. | eng |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ariceta A, Chambrone L, Stuhr S, Couso-Queiruga E. Effect of suturing in root coverage via coronally advanced flaps: A systematic review. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2025;15:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10312 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/cap.10312 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2163-0097 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/63006 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | |
| dc.relation.hasversion | https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10312 | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | esthetics | |
| dc.subject | gingival recession | |
| dc.subject | surgery | |
| dc.subject | surgical flaps | |
| dc.title | Effect of suturing in root coverage via coronally advanced flaps : a systematic review | eng |
| dc.type | contribution to journal | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 190 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 2 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 179 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Clinical Advances in Periodontics | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 15 | |
| oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |