Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
566.3 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
"Context - Healthcare-associated infection represents the most frequent adverse event during care delivery. Medical advances
like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy have brought improvement on quality of life to patients but an increased risk of
healthcare-associated infection. Predictive risk factors for peristomal wound infection are largely unknown but evidence suggests
that antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies related to infection control may reduce infection rates. Objectives - The primary
aim was to evaluate the global prevalence rate of peristomal infection. Secondary objectives were to characterise the positive culture
results, to evaluate the prophylactic antibiotic protocol and to identify potential risk factors for peristomal infection. Methods - Retrospective
study of 297 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed at a general hospital between January 2004
and September 2010. Patients received prophylactic cefazolin before the endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. Medical records were
reviewed for demographic data, underling disease conditions to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and patient potential intrinsic
risk factors. Statistical analysis was made with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. Results - A total of 297 percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy tubes were inserted. Wound infection occurred in 36 patients (12.1%). Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant was
the most frequently isolated microorganism (33.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.6%). The incidence rate had been rising
each year and differ from 4.65% in 2004/2007 to 17.9% in 2008/2010. This finding was consistent with the increasing of prevalence
global infection rates of the hospital. Most of the infections (55.6%) were detected in the first 10 days post procedure. There was
no significant difference in age, body mass index values, mean survival time and duration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
feeding between patients with and without periostomal infection. Institutional factors, namely global prevalence infection rates and
the endemic character of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant, play an important role in peristomal infection rates. Traditional
antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin is not adequate due to the prevalence of resistant organisms. Conclusions - Peristomal infection
is a frequent problem with clinical impact in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients and should be considered a healthcare
associated infection. The antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens using cephalosporins are not adequate and need to be reviewed due
to the high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant and other resistant organisms in hospitals and nursing homes."
Description
Keywords
Gastrostomy Gastrointestinal endoscopy Wound infection Staphylococcus aureus Antibiotic prophylaxis
Citation
Arq Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;49(4):255-8.
Publisher
IBEPEGE