Percorrer por autor "Sarmento, M"
A mostrar 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- How to measure a Hill-Sachs lesion: a systematic reviewPublication . Maio, M; Sarmento, M; Moura, N; Cartucho, AQuantifying bone loss is important to decide the best treatment for patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Currently, there is no standard method available to make a precise evaluation of the Hill-Sachs lesion and predict its engagement before the surgical procedure. This literature review was performed in order to identify existing published imaging methods quantifying humeral head bone loss in Hill-Sachs lesions.Searches were undertaken in Scopus and PubMed databases from January 2008 until February 2018. The search terms were "Hill-Sachs" and "measurement" for the initial search and "Hill-Sachs bone loss" for the second, to be present in the keywords, abstracts and title. All articles that presented a method for quantifying measurement of Hill-Sachs lesions were analysed.Several methods are currently available to evaluate Hill-Sachs lesions. The length, width and depth measurements on CT scans show strong inter and intra-observer correlation coefficients. Three-dimensional CT is helpful for evaluation of bony injuries; however, there were no significant differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements. The on-track off-track method using MRI allows a simultaneous evaluation of the Hill-Sachs and glenoid bone loss and also predicts the engaging lesions with good accuracy. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:151-157. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031.
- Influence of age-related bone density changes on primary stability in stemless shoulder arthroplasty: A multi-implant finite element studyPublication . Monteiro, HL; Antunes, M; Sarmento, M; Quental, C; Folgado, JBackground: Stemless implants were introduced to prevent some of the stem-related complications associated with the total shoulder arthroplasty. Although general requirements for receiving these implants include good bone quality conditions, little knowledge exists about how bone quality affects implant performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of age-induced changes in bone density, as a metric of bone quality, in the primary stability of five anatomic stemless shoulder implants using 3D finite element (FE) models. Methods: The implant designs considered were based on the Global Icon, Sidus, Simpliciti, SMR, and Inhance stemless implants. Shoulder arthroplasties were virtually simulated in Solidworks. The density distributions of 20 subjects from two age groups, 20 to 40 and 60 to 80 years old, were retrieved from medical image data and integrated into three-dimensional FE models of a single humerus geometry, developed in Abaqus, to avoid confounding factors associated with geometric characteristics. For the designs which do not have a solid collar covering the entire bone surface, i.e., the Sidus, Simpliciti, SMR, and Inhance implants, contact and non-contact conditions between the humeral head component and bone were considered. Primary stability was evaluated through the assessment of micromotions at the bone-implant interface considering eight load cases related to rehabilitation activities and demanding tasks. Three research variables, considering 20 μm, 50 μm, and 150 μm as thresholds for osseointegration, were used for a statistical analysis of the results. Results: The decreased bone density registered for the 60-80 age group led to larger micromotions at the bone-implant interface when compared to the 20-40 age group. The Global Icon-based and Inhance-based designs were the least sensitive to bone density, whereas the Sidus-based design was the most sensitive to bone density. The establishment of contact between the humeral head component and bone for the implants that do not have a solid collar led to decreased micromotions. Discussion: Although the age-induced decline in bone density led to increased micromotions in the FE models, some stemless shoulder implants presented good overall performance regardless of the osseointegration threshold considered, suggesting that age alone may not be a contraindication to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. If only primary stability is considered, the results suggested superior performance for the Global Icon-based and Inhance-based designs. Moreover, the humeral head component should contact the resected bone surface when feasible. Further investigation is necessary to combine these results with the long-term performance of the implants and allow more precise recommendations. Keywords: Shoulder arthroplasty; bone density; finite element method; micromotions; primary stability; stemless shoulder implants.
- Knotted or knotless double-row rotator cuff repair retear rates: a systematic review and meta-analysisPublication . Figueiredo, JA; Sarmento, M; Moura, N; Gomes, DS; Cartucho, ABackground: Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair techniques used to rely on knot-tying double row techniques, but the advent of knotless transosseous equivalent procedures introduced a new variable to the debate. The purpose of this study is to determine which technique is associated with lower retear rates. For its' biomechanical advantages, the authors' hypothesis is that knotless techniques would have lower retear rates. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed via PubMed and Google Scholar by two independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Papers reporting retear rates after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair using knotted double-row or knotless transosseous equivalent techniques, evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery, were retrieved. Studies that do not differentiate between techniques and nonclinical reports were excluded. Eligible data was analyzed with Review Manager 5.4.1 using Mantel-Haenszel statistics with a fixed effect model. Results: The authors' initial literature search retrieved 511 reports. After the selection process, 24 articles were available for this review, and 9 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comparison of 1888 subjects from noncomparative reports and a meta-analysis of reports in which both techniques were studied could not show a statistically significant difference in technique retear rates. Discussion and conclusion: The current report revealed no significant difference in retear rates between the two arthroscopic repair techniques. Studies' quality was a limitation. Only two reported level 1 evidence. This review could not control variables such as cuff tear size, tissue quality, or individual comorbidities. Larger and longer follow-up studies could be helpful to further investigate this topic.
- Surgical Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears After 65 Years of Age: A Systematic ReviewPublication . Silva, BM; Cartucho, A; Sarmento, M; Moura, NINTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyze current evidence regarding surgical management of rotator cuff tears in patients of 65 years of age and above. Our hypothesis was that surgical repair of rotator cuff tears, in patients older than 65 years, conveys good outcome scores. We have not found a similar systematic review in current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline®, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1999 unto December 2015 for studies, regardless of language, including the words 'rotator cuff' and '65 years' or '70 years'. Inclusion criteria were studies (level I to IV) that reported clinical outcomes in patients older than 65 years, having undertaken surgical repair of a symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopic, mini open and open techniques were included. Exclusion criteria were: studies with patients younger than 65 years, studies that did not use validated outcome evaluation scores as primary assessment tools and those with follow up under one year. This work followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - PRISMA guidelines. Data abstracted included patient demographics, tear pattern, surgical procedures, clinical and repair results. Outcome scores were converted to percentages, allowing comparison of data between studies. RESULTS: After deep analysis, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: 11 level IV studies, 1 level III study and 2 level II studies. Seven studies found statistically significant outcome improvements between pre and postoperative evaluations. All studies reported good or excellent surgical outcomes. DISCUSSION: Better results would probably be achieved if all studies had rigorous and homogeneous patient selection criteria, but the fact is, that even though this was not the case, the clinical scores remained favorable, and with statistically significant outcome improvement in all studies with prospectively collected data. CONCLUSION: Based on current literature, rotator cuff repair in patients older than 65 years imparts favorable improvement in clinical outcome scores and overall patient satisfaction.