Repository logo
 
Publication

Risk factors associated with the stability of mini-implants and mini-plates: systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorMattos, Paola
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Flavio
dc.contributor.authorBasso, Isabela
dc.contributor.authorZeigelboim, Bianca
dc.contributor.authorNiwa, Marcio
dc.contributor.authorNeto, José
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Rosane Sampaio
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, Cristiano
dc.contributor.authorGuariza‑Filho, Odilon
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T14:53:21Z
dc.date.available2022-04-12T14:53:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-21
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the risk factors associated with the stability of mini-implants and mini-plates in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment using temporary anchorage devices. Material and Methods: Search strategies were developed for each electronic database (PubMed/Medline, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and gray literature (Google Scholar, Proquest, and Open Grey). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias and Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions of random effects were performed for the outcomes of interest. Results: A total of 1517 articles were found, of which seven were selected for quantitative synthesis. When comparing the risk of failure between mini-implants and mini-plates, the risk values approached the threshold of statistical significance (p = 0.07) (RR = 1.83; 95% CI = 0.96–3.50; I2 = 69%), showing significance after sensitivity analysis (p < 0.05) and a greater risk for mini-implants. Mandible installation presented a higher risk of failure (RR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.17–2.91). Conclusions: The evidence found indicates that failure in the stability is related to the type of device and that there is a greater risk by using isolated mini-implants, especially when positioned in the mandible. Clinical relevance: These findings help the orthodontist and/or the surgeon to stipulate risks, learn about the predictability of techniques, and communicate with the patient in an easier way.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04212-zpt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/40212
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSpringerpt_PT
dc.subjectTemporary anchoring devicespt_PT
dc.subjectMini-implantpt_PT
dc.subjectMini-platept_PT
dc.subjectStabilitypt_PT
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_PT
dc.titleRisk factors associated with the stability of mini-implants and mini-plates: systematic review and meta-analysispt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage82pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2022pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage65pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleClinical Oral Investigationspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume26pt_PT
person.familyNameSampaio Santos
person.givenNameRosane
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6400-5706
person.identifier.ridA-1597-2017
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36097057500
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd56a060e-6046-4eb2-960d-f62fbe1beb09
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd56a060e-6046-4eb2-960d-f62fbe1beb09

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
DeMattos2022_Article_RiskFactorsAssociatedWithTheSt.pdf
Size:
3.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format