Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparing assessment tools as candidates for personalized nutritional evaluation of senior citizens in a nursing home

dc.contributor.authorSousa-Catita, Diogo
dc.contributor.authorBernardo, Maria Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Carla Adriana
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Leonor
dc.contributor.authorMascarenhas, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorGodinho, Catarina
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T13:12:50Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T13:12:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractNutrition is an important health issue for seniors. In nursing homes, simple, inexpensive, fast, and validated tools to assess nutritional risk/status are indispensable. A multisurvey cross-sectional study with a convenient sample was created, comparing five nutritional screening/assessment tools and the time required for each, in order to identify the most useful instrument for a nursing home setting. Nutrition risk/status was evaluated using the following tools: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and calf girth (CG). The time spent completing each tool was recorded. Eighty-three subjects were included. MNA-SF and CG were the screening tools that ranked highest with regards to malnutrition identification. CG failed to identify nutritional risk/malnutrition in seniors with lower limb edema. CG was the fastest tool while SGA was the slowest. This was the first study comparing non-invasive nutritional tools with time expended as a consideration in the implementation. CG is responsive, fast, and reliable in elders without edema. MNA-SF was more efficient at detecting malnutrition cases in the elderly population. Both MNA-SF and CG are considered the most suitable for the nursing home setting.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSousa-Catita D, Bernardo MA, Santos CA, Silva ML, Mascarenhas P, Godinho C, Fonseca J. Comparing Assessment Tools as Candidates for Personalized Nutritional Evaluation of Senior Citizens in a Nursing Home. Nutrients. 2021; 13(11):4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13114160pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu13114160pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/40008
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherMDPIpt_PT
dc.relationEgas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu13114160pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectGeriatricspt_PT
dc.subjectAgingpt_PT
dc.subjectOld agept_PT
dc.subjectNutritional screeningpt_PT
dc.subjectMini nutritional assessment short formpt_PT
dc.subjectCalf girthpt_PT
dc.titleComparing assessment tools as candidates for personalized nutritional evaluation of senior citizens in a nursing homept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleEgas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04585%2F2020/PT
oaire.citation.startPage4160pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleNutrientspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume13(11)pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
person.familyNameSardinha Bernardo
person.familyNameSilva
person.familyNameMascarenhas
person.familyNameGodinho
person.familyNameFonseca
person.givenNameMaria Alexandra
person.givenNameMaria Leonor
person.givenNamePaulo
person.givenNameCatarina
person.givenNameJorge
person.identifierABF-6650-2020
person.identifier.ciencia-id9C1F-B570-F42A
person.identifier.ciencia-idCB18-9E17-5925
person.identifier.ciencia-id671B-BE80-50F2
person.identifier.ciencia-id3919-33C7-AAF3
person.identifier.ciencia-id0217-4780-74BC
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8442-004X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8087-475X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6584-1199
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2304-3129
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6477-7028
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56739744600
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione3c5805b-b53e-4fc6-8fa6-902ae6799589
relation.isAuthorOfPublication42f6ed45-e33e-4cd5-a4d0-5515d3d806bf
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdec1aee9-4e58-4386-a34a-cc677663b098
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd399ed41-ae52-47d2-98aa-9de8dce31b05
relation.isAuthorOfPublication09b1d3a7-7536-44e6-93a4-cab4f7995153
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery09b1d3a7-7536-44e6-93a4-cab4f7995153
relation.isProjectOfPublicatione74bd138-4d07-4a6d-b12f-ebfed6daf4c1
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye74bd138-4d07-4a6d-b12f-ebfed6daf4c1

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Artigo_CGodinho_2021_02.pdf
Size:
2.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format