Repository logo
 
Publication

Drooling rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorNascimento, David
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Jaqueline
dc.contributor.authorMestre, Tiago
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T13:49:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-06T13:49:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-21
dc.description.abstractBackground: Drooling is a clinically relevant non-motor symptom of people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP). Several drooling rating scales are available. Nevertheless, the compelling scientific evidence supporting their validity is limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical rating scales for drooling, assessing their characteristics, clinimetric properties, and clinical utility classification. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken. Two reviewers performed independent literature searches using the CENTRAL®, CINAHL®, Embase®, MEDLINE®, SciElo®, and SPEECH BITE® databases. We used consensusbased standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and the International Parkinson’s disease and the Movement Disorders (MDS) criteria to evaluate the included rating scales. Results: The following six rating scales were identified: Drooling Impact Scale (DIS), Sialorrhea Scoring Scale (SSS), Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS), Drooling Rating Scale (DRS), Sialorrhea Clinical Scale for Parkinson Disease (SCS-PD), and the Radboud Oral Motor inventory for Parkinson’s disease – Saliva (ROMPsaliva). The scales had heterogeneous characteristics: (i) not all were created/adapted for PwP; (ii) different dimensions associated with drooling are assessed; (iii) cross-cultural adaptations are limited to some languages. The clinimetric properties showed: (i) target population size limitations; (ii) incomplete reliability analysis; (iii) lack of robust validity; (iv) sensitivity to change not fully explored. Following the MDS criteria, only one tool was classified as “recommended”, the ROMP-saliva. Conclusions: This review provides information for an adequate selection of a drooling rating scale for clinical and/or research purposes. To date, ROMP-saliva is the only scale with substantial evidence of its clinimetric properties adequacy and data in PwP.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.012pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1353-8020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/40139
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.subjectParkinson’s diseasept_PT
dc.subjectSialorrheapt_PT
dc.subjectDroolingpt_PT
dc.subjectRating scalespt_PT
dc.titleDrooling rating scales in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage180pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue91pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage173pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleParkinsonism and Related Disorderspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume2021pt_PT
person.familyNameNascimento
person.familyNameCarmona
person.familyNameGuimarães
person.givenNameDavid
person.givenNameJaqueline
person.givenNameIsabel
person.identifier548796
person.identifier.ciencia-idEC16-C662-A9AE
person.identifier.ciencia-id881A-3CA7-AFCE
person.identifier.ciencia-idF014-BFD6-49C2
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6931-4660
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8628-8145
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8524-8731
person.identifier.scopus-author-id24586862700
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc87bea6b-0dad-476c-aeb7-24fb31d75d22
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcfa6ef19-bf1f-4039-bb8f-fe12293a84ca
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdc9a77a2-eecf-4d30-88fa-4200275eccf5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc87bea6b-0dad-476c-aeb7-24fb31d75d22

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2021_Drooling_PIIS1353802021003412.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format