Repository logo
 
Publication

Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects

dc.contributor.authorMascarenhas, VV
dc.contributor.authorRego, P
dc.contributor.authorDantas, P
dc.contributor.authorGaspar, A
dc.contributor.authorSoldado, F
dc.contributor.authorConsciência, JG
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-20T21:38:36Z
dc.date.available2017-06-20T21:38:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to use 3D computed tomography (CT) to define head-neck morphologic gender-specific and normative parameters in asymptomatic individuals and use the omega angle (Ω°) to provide quantification data on the location and radial extension of a cam deformity. METHODS: We prospectively included 350 individuals and evaluated 188 asymptomatic hips that underwent semiautomated CT analysis. Different thresholds of alpha angle (α°) were considered in order to analyze cam morphology and determine Ω°. We calculated overall and gender-specific parameters for imaging signs of cam morphology (Ω° and circumferential α°). RESULTS: The 95 % reference interval limits were beyond abnormal thresholds found in the literature for cam morphology. Specifically, α° at 3/1 o´clock were 46.9°/60.8° overall, 51.8°/65.4° for men and 45.7°/55.3° for women. Cam prevalence, magnitude, location, and epicenter were significantly gender different. Increasing α° correlated with higher Ω°, meaning that higher angles correspond to larger cam deformities. CONCLUSION: Hip morphometry measurements in this cohort of asymptomatic individuals extended beyond current thresholds used for the clinical diagnosis of cam deformity, and α° was found to vary both by gender and measurement location. These results suggest that α° measurement is insufficient for the diagnosis of cam deformity. Enhanced morphometric evaluation, including 3D imaging and Ω°, may enable a more accurate diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • 95% reference interval limits of cam morphotype were beyond currently defined thresholds. • Current morphometric definitions for cam-type morphotype should be applied with care. • Cam prevalence, magnitude, location, and epicenter are significantly gender different. • Cam and alpha angle thresholds should be defined according to sex/location. • Quantitative 3D morphometric assessment allows thorough and reproducible FAI diagnosis and monitoring.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationEur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2011-2023.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-016-4530-0pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/18556
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.subjectTomografia Computadorizadapt_PT
dc.subjectCabeça do Femurpt_PT
dc.subjectImpacto Femoroacetabularpt_PT
dc.subjectColo do Femurpt_PT
dc.subjectFemúrpt_PT
dc.subjectFemur Headpt_PT
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computedpt_PT
dc.subjectFemur Neckpt_PT
dc.subjectFemoracetabular Impingementpt_PT
dc.titleCam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjectspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage2023pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue5pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage2011-2023pt_PT
oaire.citation.volume27pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cam deformity and the omega angle (1).pdf
Size:
2.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: