Repository logo
 
Publication

Operational definitions of asthma in recent epidemiological studies are inconsistent.

dc.contributor.authorSá-Sousa, A
dc.contributor.authorJacinto, T
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, LF
dc.contributor.authorMorais-Almeida, M
dc.contributor.authorRobalo-Cordeiro, C
dc.contributor.authorBugalho-Almeida, A
dc.contributor.authorBousquet, J
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, JA
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-04T19:51:27Z
dc.date.available2015-01-04T19:51:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The best combination of questions to define asthma in epidemiological asthma studies is not known. We summarized the operational definitions of asthma used in prevalence studies and empirically assess how asthma prevalence estimates vary depending on the definition used. METHODS: We searched the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of knowledge and included (1) cross-sectional studies (2) on asthma prevalence (3) conducted in the general population and (4) containing an explicit definition of asthma. The search was limited to the 100 most-cited papers or published since January 2010. For each paper, we recorded the asthma definition used and other variables. Then we applied the definitions to the data of the Portuguese National Asthma survey (INAsma) and of the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) computing asthma prevalence estimates for the different definitions. RESULTS: Of 1738 papers retrieved, 117 were included for analysis. Lifetime asthma, diagnosed asthma and current asthma were defined in 8, 12 and 29 different ways, respectively. By applying definitions of current asthma on INAsma and NHANES data, the prevalence ranged between 5.3%-24.4% and 1.1%-17.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity in the definitions of asthma used in epidemiological studies leading to highly variable estimates of asthma prevalence. Studies to inform a standardized operational definition are needed. Meanwhile, we propose a set of questions to be reported when defining asthma in epidemiological studies.por
dc.identifier.citationClin Transl Allergy. 2014 Aug 4;4:24.por
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/2045-7022-4-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/7409
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relationControl and Burden of Asthma and Rhinitis
dc.subjectAsthmapor
dc.subjectAsmapor
dc.titleOperational definitions of asthma in recent epidemiological studies are inconsistent.por
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleControl and Burden of Asthma and Rhinitis
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/PTDC%2FSAU-SAP%2F119192%2F2010/PT
oaire.fundingStream5876-PPCDTI
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspor
rcaap.typearticlepor
relation.isProjectOfPublicationf45772ce-dc1b-4ff1-bb0b-5fe90f2e427c
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf45772ce-dc1b-4ff1-bb0b-5fe90f2e427c

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CTA.pdf
Size:
1.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.81 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: