Repository logo
 
Publication

New methods for the assessment of Parkinson’s Disease (2005 to 2015): a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Ferro, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorElshehabi, Morad
dc.contributor.authorGodinho, Catarina
dc.contributor.authorSalkovic, Dina
dc.contributor.authorHobert, Markus A.
dc.contributor.authorDomingos, Josefa
dc.contributor.authorvan Uem, Janet MT.
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Joaquim J.
dc.contributor.authorMaetzler, Walter
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-19T16:44:01Z
dc.date.available2017-10-01T00:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.description.abstract"BACKGROUND: The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM-PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM-PD regarding their maturity, feasibility, and usefulness in assessing the main PD features has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review of articles published in the field from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Of 9,503 publications identified in PubMed and the Web of Science, 848 full papers were evaluated, and 588 original articles were assessed to evaluate the technological, demographic, clinimetric, and technology transfer readiness parameters of NAM-PD. RESULTS: Of the studies, 65% included fewer than 30 patients, < 50% employed a standard methodology to validate diagnostic tests, 8% confirmed their results in a different dataset, and 87% occurred in a clinic or lab. The axial features domain was the most frequently studied, followed by bradykinesia. Rigidity and nonmotor domains were rarely investigated. Only 6% of the systems reached a technology level that justified the hope of being included in clinical assessments in a useful time period. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic evaluation provides an overview of the current options for quantitative assessment of PD and what can be expected in the near future. There is a particular need for standardized and collaborative studies to confirm the results of preliminary initiatives, assess domains that are currently underinvestigated, and better validate the existing and upcoming NAM-PD. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society."pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding agency: The research leading to these results has received funding from “Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte of Comunidad de Madrid” and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA Grant 291820.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSánchez-Ferro, Á., Elshehabi, M., Godinho, C., Salkovic, D., Hobert, M. A., Domingos, J., van Uem, J. MT., Ferreira, J. J. and Maetzler, W. (2016), New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review. Mov Disord., 31: 1283–1292. doi:10.1002/mds.26723pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mds.26723pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1531-8257
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/16918
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherWileypt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds.26723/abstractpt_PT
dc.subjectParkinson diseasept_PT
dc.subjectTechnology assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectBiomedicalpt_PT
dc.subjectDiagnosispt_PT
dc.subjectInventionspt_PT
dc.titleNew methods for the assessment of Parkinson’s Disease (2005 to 2015): a systematic reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1292pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1283pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleMovement Disorderspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume31(9)pt_PT
rcaap.embargofctPolítica de copyright da Revistapt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Artigo07_CGodinho_2016.pdf
Size:
309 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: