Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
965.38 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Speech intelligibility, how well a listener comprehends the speaker’s message, is related
to the listener’ expertise and type of the message conveyed. There is no evidence about speech intelligibility
in different groups of healthcare professionals and naïve listeners.
Objectives: This study is the first to understand if there were differences in the speech intelligibility of
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients by different experienced and naïve listeners, according to the speech
stimuli and dysarthria severity.
Materials and methods: Randomly digitised audio-files (50 words and 50 sentences) of 10 PD
patients, one without dysarthria and 9 with different dysarthria severities (3 each: mild, moderate and
severe dysarthria), were collected from a database of 60 PD patients’ audio-files. A jury panel was
formed by five different listeners groups including 10 speech and language therapists, 10 neurologists,
10 PD relatives, 12 PD patients, and 10 people from the general population. The jury panel transcribed
single words and sentences from the audio recordings, the percentage correctly understood was calculated
and the results were compared between the groups.
Results: Multiple comparisons showed significant speech intelligibility differences between healthcare
professionals and naïve listerners in words (highest effect size, n2 = 0.7) and sentences (the highest
effect size: n2 = 0.6). Pairwise comparisons revealed that those significant differences were specifically
in words with moderate and severe dysarthria and sentences with all severity levels of dysarthria.
Conclusion: The groups of healthcare professionals who work with dysarthria are more likely to understand the PD patients’ speech than the groups of naïve listeners.
Description
Keywords
Dysarthria Intelligibility Audio-perceptive analysis Parkinson’s disease