Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente Trabalho de Investigação Aplicada procura validar um protocolo de avaliação da capacidade anaeróbia, modificado para contexto militar, percebendo se existem correlações e diferenças significativas entre os testes já existentes e padronizados com este novo teste especificamente militar.
Antes de identificar estas correlações e diferenças entre testes, foram apresentados os testes mais conhecidos de avaliação anaeróbia. Além disso, foram identificadas as principais tarefas realizadas em combate, apresentado o equipamento que se utiliza atualmente nas missões em teatro de operações e caracterizado de um ponto de vista físico o atual campo de batalha. A questão envolvente à problemática deste estudo é “Justifica-se a realização de um teste modificado em contexto militar, para avaliação da capacidade anaeróbia em detrimento dos testes padronizados já existentes?”.
Foi utilizado o método indutivo com a técnica quantitativa, com o objetivo de recolher e analisar dados quantificáveis para encontrar uma resposta à questão central criada. O teste de hipóteses estatísticas foi essencial para encontrar resultados que fossem significativos.
Concluiu-se que a elaboração do RAST Modificado para avaliação da capacidade anaeróbia em contexto militar apresenta uma validação intrínseca com os testes padronizados, apresentando uma correlação com os testes de terreno e de laboratório.
The present research validates an anaerobic capacity assessment protocol, modified for the military context, noting if there are significant correlations and differences between existing and standardized tests with this specifically military test. Before identifying these correlations and differences between tests, the best known anaerobic evaluation tests were presented. In addition, we identified the main tasks performed in combat, presented the equipment that is currently used in the missions in theater operations and characterized from a physical point of view the current battlefield. The question surrounding the problem of this study is "Is it justified to carry out a modified test in a military context, to evaluate the anaerobic capacity to the detriment of existing standardized tests?". The inductive method was used with the quantitative technique, with the objective of collecting and analyzing quantifiable data to find an answer to the central question created. Statistical hypothesis testing was essential to find results that were significant. It was concluded that the elaboration of the Modified RAST to evaluate the anaerobic capacity in military context presents an intrinsic validation with the standardized tests, presenting a correlation with the field and laboratory tests.
The present research validates an anaerobic capacity assessment protocol, modified for the military context, noting if there are significant correlations and differences between existing and standardized tests with this specifically military test. Before identifying these correlations and differences between tests, the best known anaerobic evaluation tests were presented. In addition, we identified the main tasks performed in combat, presented the equipment that is currently used in the missions in theater operations and characterized from a physical point of view the current battlefield. The question surrounding the problem of this study is "Is it justified to carry out a modified test in a military context, to evaluate the anaerobic capacity to the detriment of existing standardized tests?". The inductive method was used with the quantitative technique, with the objective of collecting and analyzing quantifiable data to find an answer to the central question created. Statistical hypothesis testing was essential to find results that were significant. It was concluded that the elaboration of the Modified RAST to evaluate the anaerobic capacity in military context presents an intrinsic validation with the standardized tests, presenting a correlation with the field and laboratory tests.
Description
Keywords
Teste Capacidade Anaeróbia Campo de Batalha Validação