Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Comparisons of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery on consumer preferences, objective understanding, and food choices among Portuguese consumers

datacite.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde
datacite.subject.sdg03:Saúde de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorVasseur, Théo
dc.contributor.authorFialon, Morgane
dc.contributor.authorMarques-Vidal, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Paula
dc.contributor.authorMeirhaeghe, Aline
dc.contributor.authorGalan, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorKesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
dc.contributor.authorTouvier, Mathilde
dc.contributor.authorDeschasaux-Tanguy, Mélanie
dc.contributor.authorSarda, Barthélémy
dc.contributor.authorHercberg, Serge
dc.contributor.authorNabec, Lydiane
dc.contributor.authorJulia, Chantal
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-30T13:51:08Z
dc.date.available2026-04-30T13:51:08Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.description.abstractFront-of-pack nutrition labels (FoPLs) are a cost-effective measure to inform consumers about the nutritional values of foods and to help them make healthier food choices at the point of purchase. This study compared the preference and performance—objective understanding and food choices—of Portuguese consumers for two FoPLs: Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery. An experimental study was conducted in 2022 on a representative sample of 1014 Portuguese adults (mean age = 45.1 ± 13.8 years; 49% women). Participants were randomly allocated to either the Nutri-Score or the NutrInform Battery group and asked to complete an online questionnaire testing their objective understanding of the label and the effect on purchase intentions for three food categories as well as perceived helpfulness and perception of the FoPL. In terms of participants' ability to identify the most nutritionally favourable foods, Nutri-Score outperformed NutrInform Battery in all categories, with the highest performance observed for the identification of the three foods of higher nutritional value within the breakfast product category (OR = 27.8 [19.4–39.9], P < .0001). Overall, with Nutri-Score, participants were more likely to intend to purchase more nutritionally favourable products than with NutrInform Battery (OR ranging from 2.01 [1.50–2.68] for breakfast cereals to 14.6 [10.2–20.9] for added fats, P < .0001). In terms of preference, Nutri-Score was more appreciated, and perceived as easier to use, more reliable, and more informative than NutrInform Battery. The Nutri-Score appeared to be a more appreciated and effective tool than NutrInform Battery for helping Portuguese consumers to choose foods with a better nutritional composition.eng
dc.identifier.citationThéo Vasseur, Morgane Fialon, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Paula Pereira, Aline Meirhaeghe, Pilar Galan, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Mathilde Touvier, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Barthélémy Sarda, Serge Hercberg, Lydiane Nabec, Chantal Julia, Comparisons of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery on consumer preferences, objective understanding, and food choices among Portuguese consumers, European Journal of Public Health, Volume 35, Issue 4, August 2025, Pages 708–713, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf089
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckaf089
dc.identifier.issn1464-360X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/62968
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherEuropean Public Health Association
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf089
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectfats
dc.subjectcereals
dc.subjectfood
dc.subjectnutritive value
dc.subjectperception
dc.subjectscience of nutrition
dc.subjectconsumer preference
dc.subjectPortugal
dc.titleComparisons of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery on consumer preferences, objective understanding, and food choices among Portuguese consumerseng
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage713
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage708
oaire.citation.titleEuropean Journal of Public Health
oaire.citation.volume35
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo_PaulaPereira_2025_01.pdf
Tamanho:
844.84 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.85 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: