Browsing by Author "Damiano, R"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Current status and future perspectives in laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic urological surgery.Publication . Autorino, R; Stein, RJ; Lima, E; Damiano, R; Khanna, R; Haber, GP; White, MA; Kaouk, JHObjective of this study is to provide an evidence-based analysis of the current status and future perspectives of scarless urological surgery. A PubMed search has been performed for all relevant urological literature regarding natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). In addition, experience with LESS and NOTES at our own institution has been considered. All clinical and investigative reports for LESS and NOTES procedures in the urological literature have been considered. A wide variety of clinical procedures in urology have been successfully completed by using LESS techniques. Thus far, experience with NOTES has largely been investigational, although early clinical reports are emerging. Further development of instrumentation and platforms is necessary for both techniques to become more widely adopted throughout the urological community.
- Mini-laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted laparoscopy: novice surgeons' performance and perception in a porcine nephrectomy modelPublication . Autorino, R; Kim, FJ; Rassweiler, J; Sio, M; Ribal, MJ; Liatsikos, E; Damiano, R; Cindolo, L; Bove, P; Schips, L; Rané, A; Quattrone, C; Correia-Pinto, J; Lima, E
- Pure NOTES transvesical venous ligation: translational animal model of varicocelectomyPublication . Osório, L; Silva, D; Autorino, R; Damiano, R; Correia-Pinto, J; Lima, EOBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvesical venous ligation mimicking bilateral varicocelectomy in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transvesical NOTES bilateral venous ligation was performed in 6 female pigs by considering lower epigastric vessels as a model for gonadal vessels. Under flexible cystoscopic guidance, a cystotomy was created on the anterior bladder. The flexible cystoscope was introduced through the over tube, and the lower epigastric vessels were visualized in retroflexion. Thulium laser was used to cut and coagulate the vessels. A bladder catheter was left in place for 4 days in all animals and they were sacrificed 15 days after the procedure. RESULTS: The procedure was successfully carried out in all animals without intraoperative complications. Epigastric vessels were safely cut and coagulated using the thulium laser. Median time for the overall procedure, including establishment of the transvesical port, was 23 minutes (range 20-30). No complications were encountered during the postoperative follow-up period. Postmortem examination revealed complete coagulation and separation of vessels. CONCLUSION: An animal model mimicking a NOTES transvesical bilateral varicocelectomy procedure is successfully shown in the present study. Despite being encouraging, these novel findings need to be interpreted with caution. Further research is warranted and development of purpose-built instrumentation is awaited to define potential urological applications of transvesical NOTES
- Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skillsPublication . Cicione, A; Autorino, R; Breda, A; De Sio, M; Damiano, R; Fusco, F; Greco, F; Carvalho-Dias, E; Mota, P; Nogueira, C; Pinho, P; Mirone, V; Correia-Pinto, J; Rassweiler, J; Lima, EOBJECTIVE: To compare the last generation of 3-dimensional imaging (3D) vs standard 2-dimensional imaging (2D) laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted during the 4th Minimally Invasive Urological Surgical Week Course held in Braga (Portugal) in April 2013. The course participants and faculty were asked to perform standardized tasks in the dry laboratory setting and randomly assigned into 2 study groups; one starting with 3D, the other with 2D laparoscopy. The 5 tasks of the European Training in Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills were performed. Time to complete each task and errors made were recorded and analyzed. An end-of-study questionnaire was filled by the participants. RESULTS: Ten laparoscopic experts and 23 laparoscopy-naïve residents were included. Overall, a significantly better performance was obtained using 3D in terms of time (1115 seconds, interquartile range [IQR] 596-1469 vs 1299 seconds, IQR 620-1723; P = .027) and number of errors (2, IQR 1-3 vs 3, IQR 2-5.5; P = .001). However, the experts were faster only in the "peg transfer" task when using the 3D, whereas naïves improved their performance in 3 of the 5 tasks. A linear correlation between level of experience and performance was found. Three-dimensional imaging was perceived as "easier" by a third of the laparoscopy-naïve participants (P = .027). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional imaging seems to facilitate surgical performance of urologic surgeons without laparoscopic background in the dry laboratory setting. The advantage provided by 3D for those with previous laparoscopic experience remains to be demonstrated. Further studies are needed to determine the actual advantage of 3D over standard 2D laparoscopy in the clinical setting.