Repository logo
 
Publication

Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect

2022-01Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSousa, C.S.
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, D.B.
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, P.
dc.contributor.authorViana, P.
dc.contributor.authorCruz-Martins, N.
dc.contributor.authorDrummond, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T17:49:35Z
dc.date.available2022-01-06T17:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The diagnosis of airway obstruction can be made through FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 or FEV1/VC ratio < lower limit of normality (LLN). Several authors advocate that FEV1/FEV6 ratio is an alternative to diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect, while others have determined that the best cut-off for this ratio (best combined sensitivity and specificity) is 0.73. Objective: To evaluate the non-inferiority of FEV1/FEV6 ratio < 0.73 when compared to FEV1/ FVC ratio < 0.7 and FEV1/VC < LLN in diagnosing airway obstruction. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records from patients who underwent spirometry or plethysmography in a university central hospital from June 1st to December 31st, 2018 was carried out. Only medical records which included FEV1/FVC < 0.7 or FEV1/VC < LLN were selected, and these results were compared to FEV1/FEV6 ratio. Results: A total of 526 patients with obstructive ventilatory defect were identified by one of the two ratios described. Of these, 95.1%, 87.4% and 88.6% were obstructive by FEV1/FVC, FEV1/ VC, and FEV1/FEV6 ratio, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/FVC ratio was 99.6% (p < 0.001) with a diagnostic efficacy of 92.8%, whereas the PPV of FEV1/FEV6 in relation to FEV1/VC was 91.0% (p < 0.001) and diagnostic efficacy was 85.2%. Most false negatives, comparing FEV6 with the other two tests, were found in patients with FEV1 > 70% (mild obstruction) and in individuals aged >50 years. Conclusions: FEV1/FEV6 < 0.73 may be a good alternative ratio, as it is non-inferior to FEV1/VC and FEV1/FVC in diagnosing obstructive ventilatory defect.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationC.S. Sousa, D.B. Coelho, P. Amorim et al., Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the VC diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect,Pulmonology (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.11.008pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0903-1936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/38686
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisher2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Elsevier España, S.L.U.pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://erj.ersjournals.com/content/54/suppl_63/PA2647pt_PT
dc.subjectobstructive ventilatory defectpt_PT
dc.subjectpulmonary diseasept_PT
dc.subjectairway obstructionpt_PT
dc.subjectFEV1/FVCpt_PT
dc.subjectFEV1/VCpt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.subjectMadeira Islandpt_PT
dc.titleDifferences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defectpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022 - Differences between FEV6, FVC and VC at the diagnosis....pdf
Size:
296.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

SESARAM - Pneu - Artigos