Repository logo
 
Publication

Efficiency of traditional and green cryptocurrencies: A comparative analysis

dc.contributor.authorDias, Rui
dc.contributor.authorGalvão, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Aloísio Machado da Silva
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Sidalina
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-11T13:39:53Z
dc.date.available2025-06-11T13:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this research is to evaluate the efficiency, in its weak form, of digital currencies classified as "dirty", such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), and the green ones, namely Lisk (LISK), Metaverse (METAVERSE), Quantum (QTUM), Litecoin (LTC), Augur (REP), Cardano (ADA), Dash (DASH), EOS (EOS), Quantum (QTUM), Litecoin (LTC), Ripple (XRP), Augur (REP), Cardano (ADA), Dash (DASH), EOS (EOS), IOTA (IOTA), Monero (XMR), Neo (NEO), Omisego (OMG), Stellar (XLM) and Zcash (ZEC), for the period from 1 January 2018 to 23 November 2023. The results show that Bitcoin (BTC), Metaverse, Litecoin (LTC) and Cardano (ADA) have persistent behaviour with a long memory, which favours long-term strategies. Long memories indicate that markets are less efficient, where trends tend to continue, making long-term strategies more effective. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies such as Lisk, Quantum, Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Augur, Dash, EOS, IOTA, Monero, Neo, Omisego, Stellar and Zcash show antipersistent behaviour, with rapid correction of deviations, suggesting more efficient markets, but with less predictability. This favours short-term strategies such as arbitrage and scalping. The analysis reveals that cryptocurrencies with long memory, such as BTC, LTC and ADA, are more predictable in the long term, while most others, such as ETH and XRP, are more suitable for short-term trading, reflecting structural differences in the market.eng
dc.identifier.citationDias, R., Galvão, R., Filho, A. M. da S., Teixeira, N., Alexandre, P., & Gonçalves, S. (2025). Efficiency of traditional and green cryptocurrencies: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(4), 142–159.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i4.6718
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/57975
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCryptocurrencies
dc.subjectLong Memories
dc.subjectTrading Strategies
dc.subjectPortfolio Rebalancing
dc.titleEfficiency of traditional and green cryptocurrencies: A comparative analysispor
dc.typecontribution to journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6718-Article Text-15664-1-10-20250415.pdf
Size:
925.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: