Repository logo
 
Publication

Endoscopic stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of unilateral and bilateral placement of plastic and metal stents in a retrospective review of 480 patients

dc.contributor.authorLiberato, MJ
dc.contributor.authorCanena, JM
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-21T23:24:01Z
dc.date.available2014-01-21T23:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is controversial with respect to the optimal types of stents and the extent of drainage. This study evaluated endoscopic palliation in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) and plastic stents (PS).We also compared unilateral and bilateral stent placement according to the Bismuth classification. METHODS: Data on 480 patients receiving endoscopic biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between September 1995 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the following outcome parameters: technical success (TS), functional success (FS), early and late complications, stent patency and survival. Patients were followed from stent insertion until death or stent occlusion. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Bismuth classification (Group 1, type I; Group 2, type II; Group 3, type ≥ III). RESULTS: The initial stent insertion was successful in 450 (93.8%) patients. TS was achieved in 204 (88.3%) patients treated with PS and in 246 (98.8%) patients palliated with SEMS (p < 0.001). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the FS in patients treated with SEMS (97.9%) was significantly higher than in patients treated with PS (84.8%) (p < 0.001). Late complications occurred in 115 (56.4%) patients treated with PS and 60 (24.4%) patients treated with SEMS (p < 0.001). The median duration of stent patency in weeks (w) were as follows: 20 w in patients palliated with PS and 27 w in patients treated with SEMS (p < 0.0001). In Group 2, the median duration of PS patency was 17 w and 18 w for unilateral and bilateral placement, respectively (p = 0.0004); the median duration of SEMS patency was 24 w and 29 w for unilateral and bilateral placement, respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis using the Poisson regression showed that SEMS placement (B = 0.48; P < 0.01) and bilateral deployment (B = 0.24; P < 0.01) were the only independent prognostic factors associated with stent patency. CONCLUSIONS: SEMS insertion for the palliation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma offers higher technical and clinical success rates in the ITT analysis as well as lower complication rates and a superior cumulative stent patency when compared with PS placement in all Bismuth classifications. The cumulative patency of bilateral SEMS or PS stents was significantly higher than that of unilateral SEMS or PS stents, with lower occlusion rates in Bismuth II patients.por
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:103por
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-230X-12-103
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/5410
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherBioMed Centralpor
dc.subjectBile Duct Neoplasmspor
dc.subjectCholangiocarcinomapor
dc.subjectEndoscopypor
dc.subjectStentspor
dc.subjectMetalspor
dc.subjectPlasticspor
dc.subjectNeoplasias das Vias Biliarespor
dc.subjectColangiocarcinomapor
dc.subjectEndoscopiapor
dc.subjectMetaispor
dc.subjectPlásticospor
dc.titleEndoscopic stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of unilateral and bilateral placement of plastic and metal stents in a retrospective review of 480 patientspor
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspor
rcaap.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BMC Gastroenterol.pdf
Size:
372.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: