Publication
Evaluation of the cytotoxic potential of adhesives, with two on the market: Scotchbond Universal and Optibond Solo Plus, and an adhesive in the experimental phase: T1
| dc.contributor.author | Santos, Sofia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mascarenhas, Paulo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bandarra, Susana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro, Ana Clara | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maurício, Paulo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barahona, Isabel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-16T14:13:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-16T14:13:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description | Communication abstract: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of CiiEM - Reducing inequalities in Health and Society, held at Egas Moniz’ University Campus in Monte de Caparica, Almada, from June 16th to 18th, 2021. | pt_PT |
| dc.description | This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | pt_PT |
| dc.description.abstract | In vitro studies evaluating the cytotoxic potential of substances released from dental adhesives are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of the extracts of dental adhesives Scotchbond Universal and Optibond Solo Plus, and an adhesive in the experimental phase: T1. 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells and MG-63 osteoblast-like cells from human osteosarcoma were exposed for 24 h to serial extract dilutions. Cytotoxicity was determined using an MTT assay. For both cell lines, the cytotoxicity order obtained, of the unfiltered adhesive extracts, was T1 (less cytotoxic) < Optibond Solo Plus < Scotchbond Universal (most cytotoxic). | pt_PT |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.citation | Santos S, Mascarenhas P, Bandarra S, Ribeiro AC, Maurício P, Barahona I. Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Potential of Adhesives, with Two on the Market: Scotchbond Universal and Optibond Solo Plus, and an Adhesive in the Experimental Phase: T1. Medical Sciences Forum. 2021; 5(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2021005007 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/msf2021005007 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-0365-2238-8 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-0365-2237-1 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2673-9992 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/40581 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | pt_PT |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2021005007 | pt_PT |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Dental adhesives | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Cytotoxicity | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | MTT Assay | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Cell viability | pt_PT |
| dc.title | Evaluation of the cytotoxic potential of adhesives, with two on the market: Scotchbond Universal and Optibond Solo Plus, and an adhesive in the experimental phase: T1 | pt_PT |
| dc.type | other | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 7 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | Medical Sciences Forum | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.volume | 5(1) | pt_PT |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | other | pt_PT |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1