Repository logo
 
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Revisiting human relativism: guidelines for precision in information systems modelling

Use this identifier to reference this record.
Name:Description:Size:Format: 
BMSD2021-JCordeiro -vf2.pdf500.82 KBAdobe PDF Download

Authors

Advisor(s)

Abstract(s)

Human Relativism (HR) was presented a decade ago as a new philosophical stance for thinking and modelling Information Systems. The Normative Approach for Modelling Information Systems (NOMIS) adopted HR by using a human-observable-action centred perspective of information systems. By using HR, NOMIS claims to have reduced unpredictability, attributed to human behaviour, and increased precision, required by formal methods. Still, there are other approaches, some of them using formal methods, supported by different ontologies, such as the well-known Bunge–Wand–Weber ontology, that lack the necessary precision. In this paper, we explore different ontologies, their relationship to language and why they fail to deliver precision. Precision, a concept introduced in HR, as a basis for engineering, is analysed, and the way to achieve it is proposed through suggesting guidelines for further discussion and research.

Description

Keywords

Ontology Human Relativism Enterprise Ontology BWW Ontology Semiotics Information Systems Information Systems Modelling Precision in Information Systems Modelling

Citation

Cordeiro J. (2021). Revisiting human relativism: guidelines for precision in information systems modelling. In B. Shishkov (ed), Business modeling and software design. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 422. Springer, Cham.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue