Repository logo
 
Publication

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the swallowing disturbance questionnaire and the sialorrhea clinical scale in portuguese patients with Parkinson’s disease

dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Rita
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Helena
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Joana
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Daisy
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Nilza
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Joaquim
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T10:12:10Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T10:12:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-10
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: To date, no valid outcome measure has been developed in European Portuguese (EP) to evaluate the Parkinsons’ Disease (PD) patients’ (PwP) reports regarding their swallowing disturbances. Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Sialorrhea Clinical Scale for PD (SCS-PD) into EP and to determine its clinimetric properties in PwP. Materials and Methods: The original English SDQ and SCS-PD versions were cross-culturally adapted following recommendations established in international guidelines. The validation process involved 75 PwP and 65 healthy sex- and age-matched participants. Results: The EP versions of the SDQ and SCS-PD are equivalent to the original versions (content, depth, and scoring). Statistical analyses for the SDQ tool revealed good feasibility (missing data <5%), acceptability (no floor or ceiling effects), excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.95), good construct validity (78.5% revealed large to moderate loadings), moderate convergent validity (r = 0.60), good divergent validity (r = 0.40), good known-groups validity (p-value<.05) and a fair sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.700). Statistical analyses for the SCS-PD tool shows good feasibility, reasonable acceptability (floor effect), good internal consistency (Cronbach's a¼0.85), good construct validity (85.7% showed between large to moderate loadings), good convergent validity (r = 0.78), good divergent validity (r = 0.39), good known groups validity (p-value < .05) and a fair sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.704). Conclusions: The EP versions of the SDQ and SCS-PD maintained the characteristics of the original versions and therefore consistent tools to be used in PwP.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1792979pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn16512022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/40087
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt_PT
dc.subjectSwallowing disturbancept_PT
dc.subjectSialorrheapt_PT
dc.subjectParkinson’s diseasept_PT
dc.subjectDysphagiapt_PT
dc.titleCross-cultural adaptation and validation of the swallowing disturbance questionnaire and the sialorrhea clinical scale in portuguese patients with Parkinson’s diseasept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage9pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2020pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleLogopedics Phoniatrics Vocologypt_PT
person.familyNamecardoso
person.familyNameGuimarães
person.givenNamerita
person.givenNameIsabel
person.identifier548796
person.identifier.ciencia-idF014-BFD6-49C2
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4478-990X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8524-8731
person.identifier.scopus-author-id24586862700
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0d976fcb-d1b8-478a-8163-250052500b7f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdc9a77a2-eecf-4d30-88fa-4200275eccf5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydc9a77a2-eecf-4d30-88fa-4200275eccf5

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020- SDQ_SCS-PD.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format